Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Negitota/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

See the talk page of previous user, Tota negi. This is the 4th account/user. Surijeal (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm still figuring out how to compare the diffs, so I would link it here: Edit by Yukiaika3 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Malaysia&diff=prev&oldid=1072765547 Edit by User:Tota negi User_talk:Tota negi (which is a sockpuppet of Yukiaika3 and already blocked) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Malaysia&diff=prev&oldid=1074356882 Edit by User:Negitota User_talk:Negitota https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Malaysia&diff=prev&oldid=1067227101 (this is not necessarily editing a similar section, but they deleted the information about Malaysia flag being derived from Majapahit flag)Surijeal (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If I may compare with other Wiki page (Malaysian wikipedia), I will put this here: Negitota deleted the section where it is indicated that Malaysian flag was derived from Majapahit flag: https://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bendera_Malaysia&diff=5513637&oldid=5513615 The same done by Yukiaika3 before: https://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bendera_Malaysia&diff=5489941&oldid=5489928 From the edits, Negitota tried to support the argument of Yukiaika3. In this revision, they claimed that it reverse vandalism, but they in fact reversed the page to its vandalised form by Yukiaika3 https://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bendera_Malaysia&diff=5501782&oldid=5501753 Compare with https://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bendera_Malaysia&diff=5489928&oldid=5489926 and https://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bendera_Malaysia&diff=5489926&oldid=5303862

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Just add your source of information in your section, and i will not delete yoru edit. Add web source or jurnal in cition . Can you do that? Negitota (talk) 05:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * and look at your other edit, i not delete your other edit with source. i just delete one of your edit without source. so you say no one can delete your edit with no source ? Negitota (talk) 06:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. Look at my edit again. I have provided a book citation, written by a Malaysian scholar. Here (https://ms.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bendera_Malaysia&diff=5513637&oldid=5513615) it is clear that you delete the sentence with citation. So in this case, you're trying to justify your edit without even reading the page. From your behavior, it is clear that you're a sockpuppet of Yukiaika3, who has made other account such as Oppanina and Tota negi. Surijeal (talk) 10:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, when you have deleted the sentence, it was you who added new claim without reference. Look at the link again. Surijeal (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Negitota is now apparently resorting to anonymous edits at Flag of Malaysia‎ and Flag of the East India Company. Both articles are now semi-protected. Storchy (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Can I also add to this report please? On Talk:Flag of the East India Company, he has requested the same edit on the talk page.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 15:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I just add discussion in talk page. And dont edit anything . do you know human rights? So i cannot discuss in talk page anymore ? British friend345 (talk) 15:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * British friend345 blocked for many reasons. See edits. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 16:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm almost sure they are the same person. Browneyes50's edit summary is similar to Yukiaika3's. Based on the edits in Djong (ship) page: Edit by Browneyes50, compare it with edits by Yukiaika3 (similar summary), and  (deleting the part that mention the word "jong" mentioned in the 9th century Javanese inscription). In Browneyes50's edit, they said they can't find the 9th century source; This is suspicious because the citations were extensive, yet they claimed to be 15 year old in their talk page (in my POV, the Djong page is well-researched, to say they can't find the 9th century reference means they must have done some kind of searching first). So I suspected that it is just their alibi to question the information and 'possibly' to delete it in the future. I know the case is closing by now but I hope that the evidence/argument I presented may confirm the connection between the two. Surijeal (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Somewhat similar behavior can be found in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Undang-Undang_Laut_Melaka&action=history and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Undang-Undang_Laut_Melaka. Yukiaika3 questioned the cited source, mentioning that they could not find the cited reference. This is done so that he could delete a part of the information that does not match his point of view. Surijeal (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * When I mentioned Browneyes50 as their sock puppet account here (https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perbincangan_pengguna:Surijeal), they did not deny it. They also said that I blocked newcomer account in English Wikipedia (which I don't actually). This indicated that Browneyes50 is another sock puppet account. Surijeal (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 02:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other:
 * These confirmed accounts are to . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * These confirmed accounts are to . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Clearly the same as Yukiaika3: . Moved,, closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Perhaps someone should look at ? The account was created after the check.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * is ✅ to (the master account).  Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe the new account is another. Particularly in the beginning of their editing, they edited some of the same articles, added CN tags like other socks (they like adding CN tags more than any sock I've seen to date), and the timing is, of course, right. Could you check, please? I'm not sure enough to block behaviorally. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * is . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 20:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Based on the last few article edits made by Browneyes, which are very similar to edits by the master, I have blocked and tagged the new account. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Tellisavas was engaged in edit-warring on songket page on 16 October 2022. He then participated discussion that I started on talkpage. However, the result on that discussion was not in his favor, and he mentioned his dissatisfaction pn talk page.

On 20 October 2022, there are series of edit by 175.142.28.34 on songket which exhibit similar edit behavior with Tellisavas, and those reverted by various editor. As I look up edit history of 175.142.28.34 (here), his first edit have similar edit behavior with (here), which is confirmed sockpuppet of. Also if we look up page history of Songket, similar edit behavior can be found other editors as well such as (proof),  (proof),  (proof) <- confirmed sock, and  (proof) <- blocked user for edit warring.

All of the editor above are all exhibiting POV push edit that tend to push malaysian nationalistic view with similar or same editing style. Ckfasdf (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checkuser looks clean, but there is enough behavioral here for a clerk to take a look -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 11:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see enough to block, but and the IP are definitely the same as . Republizz is already blocked, so tagged as suspected. IP left alone as stale. Closing. DatGuyTalkContribs 19:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)