Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NekSeOvajVijekGordi/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
The suspected master has only edited Kuči (tribe) and its tp. After they were warned for edit warring, the suspected sock was created, supported the suspected master with a comment and then reverted to their version of the article. Both usernames are Serb poetic verses. If they are indeed the same person, this is a classic case of socking because they have portrayed themselves as unrelated. CU is needed to verify if the suspicions are correct. Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Why am i tagged, i didn't creat a sock, as that account is older than mine.
 * Sorry, but no. NekSeOvajVijekGordi (talk) 19:30, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * While the account that is blocked is not mine, i definitely have another account that was created by me long time ago, but i dont like the name.
 * It is not used, so i don't know if i have to disclose that account here. NekSeOvajVijekGordi (talk) 20:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I just blocked because their user page was created by NekSeOvajVijekGordi in a manner that strongly suggests a spare account. Johnuniq (talk) 07:50, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, . I'll block the sock indef and leave the master for someone else to evaluate. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The technical evidence here makes it quite plain that the other account is indeed operated by you, and the denial here indicates an ongoing attempt to deceive the community. On that basis, I have blocked the main account as well. NaBesmrtnomVisu is indeed older, but far less active and "functionally" the sock. No objections if someone wants to move, though. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Nope, I think this way makes more sense. Courcelles (talk) 14:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)