Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NhatMinh1701/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Recently, NhatMinh1701's edits have focused on the "status" (an infobox parameter) of historical Vietnam. NhatMinh1701 initially disagreed with calling Vietnamese dynasties tributaries of China. In one of his disagreements, he brought up historical Korea:
 * "Vietnam under the Nguyễn dynasty has never been a vassal state of the Qing dynasty. The Nguyễn emperors did have respect for the Qing dynasty but unlike Korea under the Joseon dynasty, Qing did not have any involvement in the Vietnamese politics. I would dare to say that portraying Vietnam under the Nguyễn dynasty as a vassal state of Qing was really ignorant of you."

2 days later, Polandisnotyetlost, a new user, edited Joseon to mirror what NhatMinh1701 had said about it. Polandisnotyetlost last edited at 15:26, 7 May 2020. NhatMinh1701 edited 2 minutes later at 15:28, 7 May 2020. About 3 hours later, NhatMinh1701 made a small modification to Polandisnotyetlost's edit. Polandisnotyetlost's edit was removed by an IP soon afterward. 2 days later, NhatMinh1701 edited the "status" of Joseon to say "vassal" again, which had originally been added by Polandisnotyetlost.

NhatMinh1701 also seems to have edited while logged out, perhaps accidentally. These two edits, one by an IP and one by NhatMinh1701, have identical edit comments.

Please also note this similarity between NhatMinh1701 and Polandisnotyetlost:

Polandisnotyetlost specifically said "Ming vassal" and "Qing vassal" and wikilinked to "Ming" and "Qing" (redirects), not "Ming dynasty" and "Qing dynasty" (the actual articles).

NhatMinh1701 has shown the same tendency:

NhatMinh1701 recently corrected this in some articles: (Please note that in all 3 cases, it was NhatMinh1701 who originally "shortened" them.) Bamnamu (talk) 21:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

This IP has 2 total edits. Both edits are to articles that NhatMinh1701 has edited recently. Both edits are small modifications to recent edits by NhatMinh1701.

NhatMinh1701's edit to Goryeo:

IP's edit to Goryeo:

NhatMinh1701's edit to List of flags of Vietnam:

IP's edit to List of flags of Vietnam:

Bamnamu (talk) 04:37, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, plus . --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 03:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * accounts, no action taken regarding the IP address per age and generally dynamic nature of addresses. Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 17:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Andrés Buno is a new editor (joined on 13 June 2020) whose only contributions have been to engage in the same behavior as NhatMinh1701 (blocked on 16 May 2020).

Both are focused on the "status" (an infobox parameter) of historical Vietnam, generally to portray it as an "empire" or "sovereign state":
 * Examples of NhatMinh1701's edits:
 * Examples of Andrés Buno's edits:

Both are focused on the "status" (an infobox parameter) of historical Korea, generally to portray it as a "vassal" or "tributary":
 * Examples of Polandisnotyetlost/NhatMinh1701's edits:
 * Examples of Andrés Buno's edits:

Nokia 1280, who was blocked as a "possilikely" sockpuppet of another sockmaster, may be related to NhatMinh1701. NhatMinh1701 was blocked on 16 May 2020. NhatMinh1701's unblock request was declined on 22 May 2020. Nokia 1280 was created on 23 May 2020. Nokia 1280's first edit to Wikipedia was a modification to the "status" parameter of Lê dynasty.

NhatMinh1701 uploaded an image to Wikimedia Commons at 05:58, 21 May 2020. 42.118.48.13 added that image to Pagoda at 06:05, 21 May 2020. Bamnamu (talk) 08:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Everybody's already blocked, but take a look at User:Nokia 1280 vis-a-vis Sockpuppet investigations/Peperonnie to see if we've got the wrong master, the cases should be merged, or whatever. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * - Mz7 (talk) 19:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This is a slightly complicated case; I'll try to explain it the best I can. The following accounts are ✅ to Andrés Buno:
 * This Andrés Buno group is to NhatMinh1701, but it is  to Group 1 from Sockpuppet investigations/Peperonnie/Archive.
 * This Andrés Buno group is to Nokia 1280 and Group 2 from the Peperonnie case (which was split off into Sockpuppet investigations/Zhu Zi Ling). The data is mostly different, but there is an interesting quirk which nevertheless suggests a possible relation, but nothing definitive. Mz7 (talk) 20:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the confirmed accounts above. Mz7 (talk) 08:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Per discussion with Mz7, closing - we could spend time sorting out who should be connected to whom, but everyone involved is blocked. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This Andrés Buno group is to NhatMinh1701, but it is  to Group 1 from Sockpuppet investigations/Peperonnie/Archive.
 * This Andrés Buno group is to Nokia 1280 and Group 2 from the Peperonnie case (which was split off into Sockpuppet investigations/Zhu Zi Ling). The data is mostly different, but there is an interesting quirk which nevertheless suggests a possible relation, but nothing definitive. Mz7 (talk) 20:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the confirmed accounts above. Mz7 (talk) 08:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Per discussion with Mz7, closing - we could spend time sorting out who should be connected to whom, but everyone involved is blocked. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * This Andrés Buno group is to NhatMinh1701, but it is  to Group 1 from Sockpuppet investigations/Peperonnie/Archive.
 * This Andrés Buno group is to Nokia 1280 and Group 2 from the Peperonnie case (which was split off into Sockpuppet investigations/Zhu Zi Ling). The data is mostly different, but there is an interesting quirk which nevertheless suggests a possible relation, but nothing definitive. Mz7 (talk) 20:03, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the confirmed accounts above. Mz7 (talk) 08:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Per discussion with Mz7, closing - we could spend time sorting out who should be connected to whom, but everyone involved is blocked. Closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Laska666 began editing in early July 2020, just a few weeks after NhatMinh1701's last known sock blocks at the end of June 2020. Like NhatMing1701, Laska666's activity on WP has been focused almost solely on Vietnamese history and related articles (see their interactions).

Both generally mis-identified their edits as "minor" (at least until Laska666 was notified about this in September 2020) and have combative edit summaries, particularly with accusations about China. Compare:
 * from Laska666: Chu Nom is NOT Chinese script!
 * from Laska666: Chữ Nôm was developed in 8th century based on chữ Hán (Vietnamese version of Hanzi). Chinese liars, stop faking our history
 * from ): Writing Classic Chinese" is total unnecessary. You forbid added "Writing Classic Chinese" to Vietnam articles ONLY, not in Japan or Korea's pages because you have purpose to make people think "Vietnam stole Classic Chinese". Vietnam has its own scripts, called Chu Nom and Vietnamese alphabet.

Both have focused on changing "__ dynasty" to "Dai Viet":
 * by Laska666: there was no country called "early lê dynasty". Vietnam is not china, korea
 * by NhatMinh1701: The official name of Vietnam under Lê dynasty is Đại Việt, calling it "Lê triều" was just to distinguish it from Mạc dynasty

Laska666 could also be related to, who also has a long history of combative socks in the topic area. — MarkH21talk 22:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

More sockpuppets

 * More glaringly obvious is the 19 new SPAs that edited the article (Cham–Vietnamese War (982)) that Laska666 recently created, although some may be from or another sockpuppeteer. Some of the new accounts are definitely related to each other as making small edits to the same articles (e.g. Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, Qaransoor Party, and Carmel Convent School). A sleeper check is warranted. — MarkH21talk 22:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added some more from the other comon articles; this unusual group of new users are probably not related to NhatMinh1701. If a clerk can find a better SPI to list them under, please do. I also couldn't list all of them, there are so many! — MarkH21talk 23:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * More glaringly obvious is the 19 new SPAs that edited the article (Cham–Vietnamese War (982)) that Laska666 recently created, although some may be from or another sockpuppeteer. Some of the new accounts are definitely related to each other as making small edits to the same articles (e.g. Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, Qaransoor Party, and Carmel Convent School). A sleeper check is warranted. — MarkH21talk 22:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added some more from the other comon articles; this unusual group of new users are probably not related to NhatMinh1701. If a clerk can find a better SPI to list them under, please do. I also couldn't list all of them, there are so many! — MarkH21talk 23:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * More glaringly obvious is the 19 new SPAs that edited the article (Cham–Vietnamese War (982)) that Laska666 recently created, although some may be from or another sockpuppeteer. Some of the new accounts are definitely related to each other as making small edits to the same articles (e.g. Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, Qaransoor Party, and Carmel Convent School). A sleeper check is warranted. — MarkH21talk 22:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added some more from the other comon articles; this unusual group of new users are probably not related to NhatMinh1701. If a clerk can find a better SPI to list them under, please do. I also couldn't list all of them, there are so many! — MarkH21talk 23:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * More glaringly obvious is the 19 new SPAs that edited the article (Cham–Vietnamese War (982)) that Laska666 recently created, although some may be from or another sockpuppeteer. Some of the new accounts are definitely related to each other as making small edits to the same articles (e.g. Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, Qaransoor Party, and Carmel Convent School). A sleeper check is warranted. — MarkH21talk 22:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added some more from the other comon articles; this unusual group of new users are probably not related to NhatMinh1701. If a clerk can find a better SPI to list them under, please do. I also couldn't list all of them, there are so many! — MarkH21talk 23:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * More glaringly obvious is the 19 new SPAs that edited the article (Cham–Vietnamese War (982)) that Laska666 recently created, although some may be from or another sockpuppeteer. Some of the new accounts are definitely related to each other as making small edits to the same articles (e.g. Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, Qaransoor Party, and Carmel Convent School). A sleeper check is warranted. — MarkH21talk 22:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added some more from the other comon articles; this unusual group of new users are probably not related to NhatMinh1701. If a clerk can find a better SPI to list them under, please do. I also couldn't list all of them, there are so many! — MarkH21talk 23:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * More glaringly obvious is the 19 new SPAs that edited the article (Cham–Vietnamese War (982)) that Laska666 recently created, although some may be from or another sockpuppeteer. Some of the new accounts are definitely related to each other as making small edits to the same articles (e.g. Ibrahim Khaleel Inuwa, Qaransoor Party, and Carmel Convent School). A sleeper check is warranted. — MarkH21talk 22:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added some more from the other comon articles; this unusual group of new users are probably not related to NhatMinh1701. If a clerk can find a better SPI to list them under, please do. I also couldn't list all of them, there are so many! — MarkH21talk 23:08, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Posted a new AN thread for more on this. — MarkH21talk 23:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As explained at AN, these are probably unrelated new editors pooled together by the copyedit tag. This list can probably be ignored then. — MarkH21talk 23:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above list can be ignored, they’re are all new editors drawn to copyediting tags as explained at AN. The main report here is about Laska666 with NhatMinh1701 / Andrés Buno / Peperonnie. — MarkH21talk 02:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

A long lapping and baseless accusation. My contributions are constructive and used RSs. Victor Lieberman's Strange Parallels: Integration of the Mainland Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800-1830, Vol 1, pp. 24, 26, 29, 32 the maps show very decisively that the kingdom of Dai Viet existed until early 19th century, ie. 1802 which was replaced by the kingdom of Vietnam (1802-1883). Was there a state called "Le kingdom"? Laska666 (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Well all history books I cited say the same ideas. What is your other proof? Laska666 (talk) 23:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This list is wayyyy too long for me to go through. I spot-checked a few on the list, and they're all coming back ❌.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Laska666 is ❌ to NhatMinh1701. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I also looked at that pair's timecards. Even if they evaded CU detection via clever use of proxies, it also looks like their sleep/wake cycles are 12 hours out of phase.  So, yeah, what  said. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New user whose few edits include: The behavioral evidence is pretty clear given NhatMinh1701's past socking in this area, even if the master and confirmed socks are stale by now.
 * 1) Reinserting NhatMinh1701's preferred version ( vs ) of the "status" parameter of the infobox at Mongol invasions of Vietnam, similar to the MO of NhatMinh1701's previous confirmed socks (see the first two sections of the archive).
 * 2) my  of NhatMinh1701 on a page that I haven't edited since last year.
 * 3) on the talk page to support restoring NhatMinh1701's preferred version.

Several IPs have been periodically restoring NhatMinh1701's edits and inserting their uploaded images elsewhere (e.g. ), although I understand that CU won't be able to publicly use this. — MarkH21talk 20:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding for a CU against Norewritinghistory since their  have been to restore the same infobox parameter, identical to .— MarkH21talk 21:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Norewritingofhistory is claiming to be a new user who just happens to casually refer to my edit from May 2020, the month that NhatMinh1701 was blocked for sockpuppetry, and a supposed discussion with (that I don't recall ever occurring?) on the sock-heavy East Asian cultural sphere article that NhatMinh1701 edited. The confirmed NhatMinh1701 socks from 2020 may be stale so there may be little CU can do against those accounts, but the behavioral evidence is clear. — MarkH21talk 22:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Go ahead and check me. 1) I am from Australia and am using a Samsung device. I am not nhatminh or any other sockpuppet. And I only edited the mongol invasion of vietnam article once. I was correcting my typos and fixing my "wiki language" or coding on the talk page because I'm still learning things here. I was not the only one who reinserted his answer either. Even on tne talk page, another user disagreed with markd21 and even another user named Peacemaker67 was skeptical of markd21's sources.

2) I was following a wiki user that led me to the mongol invasion of vietnam war article. I like to check the history of each wikipedia article to see the type of person who would put that information in the article. You can check my history, I have only edited the Mongol vs Vietnam article once, and it is not my first edit. This user Markd21 is accusing me of something that I am not.

3) I never referenced his argument until my last point on the talk page. I completely forgot about him until markh21 replied to me again and I went on to read the talk page again to check my answer and reedit.

Markd21 also has a history of being incorrect in articles relating to asian history. Such as the east asia cultural map https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:East_Asian_Cultural_Sphere.png#Inclusion_of_extended_East_Asian_Cultural_Sphere https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:East_Asian_Cultural_Sphere.png in which markh21 does not remove the light blue shades of the map despite it being made by a sockpuppet and a blocked user. Chipmunkdavis had to correct the entry. His answers relating to asian study and history should not be valid. Sometimes I even suspect him of purposefully filling in incorrect detail for his own agenda.

I will even link the talk page and article so you can see for yourself. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasions_of_Vietnam https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mongol_invasions_of_Vietnam#Labeling_invasions_as_%22victory%22%2C_%22defeat%22%2C_or_%22inconclusive%22

Here is a tip and life lesson for you, markh21. Just because other people have different voices than yours, doesn't mean they are wrong, especially when it is a contested article between the majority and the minority (you). I even gave out detailed answers and spent my time discussing with you, which you haven't replied back to. Learn to accept others and learn to get better sources that are reliable, instead of just resorting to accusing me of being a sockpuppet. So if someone makes one objection to your rule they are immediately a sockpuppet? That just makes you sound defeatist and quite honestly, childish.

Also you say that my only edit is the mongol vs vietnam article yet my edit history has more than one article edit, the mongol vs vietnam war is not even my first article. You are rewriting and making things up to get me banned. Are there consequences of users misusing wikipedia to ban their opposition?

Markh21 thinks that I am nhatminh because.I found something he wrote a year ago. Like as if nhatminh has even done anything so far to him for the past year since the last interacted. And if I was him why would I wait a year? Why a year specifically? I was following chipmunkdavis from his edit of east asian people from my old edit of east asian people to check if it was still modified by the potential wumao. And he happened to revert the old map of east asia cultural sphere map. So I went to the edit history and talk page of the map and went searching the names of the people who put the lighter shade regions as they were apparently sock puppets. So I manage to stumble upon that talk page made by markh21. Markh21 is clearly misuing wikipedia to try to ban a noobie like me out. I don't even know how to revert edits still. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norewritingofhistory (talk • contribs) 23:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The 'possible' user is in the same country and using the same ISP, but in different geolocations. That's all I can really give you...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The 'possible' user is in the same country and using the same ISP, but in different geolocations. That's all I can really give you...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The 'possible' user is in the same country and using the same ISP, but in different geolocations. That's all I can really give you...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The 'possible' user is in the same country and using the same ISP, but in different geolocations. That's all I can really give you...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The 'possible' user is in the same country and using the same ISP, but in different geolocations. That's all I can really give you...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Even if Sun moo is NhatMinh, they haven't edited in months, and CU says that Norewriting is probably a no (though their username does not inspire confidence). Closing without action. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious block evasion under the new static IP 14.244.0.22, with an extraordinary overlap with NhatMinh1701 following earlier attempts under other IPs to reinstate NhatMinh1701's edits and images.

At Mongol invasions of Vietnam, edits to the infobox "result" parameter:
 * on 10 May 2020
 * on 10 May 2020
 * on 11 May 2020
 * by 14.244.0.22 on 7 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021

At Đại Việt–Lan Xang War (1479–84), edits to change the military strength figure to "230,000":
 * on 4 May 2020
 * on 5 December 2021
 * on 5 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021

At Đại Việt–Lan Xang War (1479–84), edits to the infobox "result" parameter:
 * on 10 May 2020
 * on 5 December 2021
 * on 5 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021

At Pagoda, edits to insert NhatMinh1701's image of the Trấn Quốc Pagoda (Commons:File:Bảo tháp chùa Trấn Quốc.jpg which was deleted for copyvio on 28 November 2021):
 * by 113.22.55.100 on 10 May 2020
 * by 42.118.48.13 on 21 May 2020 (as reported here by )
 * by 14.244.0.22 on 4 December 2021 (with another file of the same pagoda after the deletion at Commons)
 * by 14.244.0.22 on 4 December 2021
 * by 14.244.0.22 on 7 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021

At Hanoi, edits to remove the images of St. Joseph's Cathedral and the Hanoi Opera House, while adding NhatMinh's image of the Trấn Quốc Pagoda in the infobox gallery:
 * by 2405:4800:28dd:399e:58a2:b337:9ec1:b37c and 42.118.112.70 on 25 October 2020
 * by 1.53.37.178 on 30 January 2021
 * by 78.35.8.194 on 13 March 2021
 * by 183.80.206.172 on 10 May 2021
 * by 14.244.0.22 on 2 December 2021
 * on 7 December 2021

WP:DUCK. — MarkH21talk 05:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Now, the IP has moved on to make an account named to  NhatMinh1701's edits once again. Formally adding the CU request tag for that particular account. — MarkH21talk 06:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The editor has now acknowledged their newest sockpuppetry . CU is only needed for any accounts that may have gone unnoticed. — MarkH21talk 06:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All of the old socks will be stale now, but this is a DUCK anyway. Account indeffed sans TPA per block on master, IP blocked for one week. Closing   Girth Summit  (blether)  14:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)