Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nhiêu Lộc/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Per edits on Draft:Đặng Đăng Phước. Nhiêu Lộc and Âu Dạ Nam all used  w'  on edit summary. FWIW, diff1 and diff2 Lemonaka (talk) 00:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Mz7@RoySmith @Nhiêu Lộc Sorry for all misunderstanding, I'd like to close this SPI if possible. Lemonaka (talk) 16:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * [w'] that's mean wikify, with a small changing. I used to use it over 10 years ago. Bro. Nhiêu Lộc (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I haven't run a check yet. I'm inclined to apply WP:AGF here per Nhiêu Lộc's explanation above, and I would also note Âu Dạ Nam's explanation that these two could be brothers, see . I know that that explanation is ordinarily unconvincing, but in this case Nhiêu Lộc does seem to be an established user on viwiki, and I'm inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt. Are you and Âu Dạ Nam truly siblings? Mz7 (talk) 09:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree with . Looking at the edits to Draft:Đặng Đăng Phước, and the edit summaries, it really does look like somebody being taught how to use Wikipedia (which is something we want to encourage).  And even if you believe that these two accounts are the same person, I'm just not seeing how this is WP:ILLEGIT.  The previous account hadn't edited in 7 years.  nto applies here.  There's plenty of legitimate socks that need hunting down; this doesn't seem like where we need to be investing effort. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing as withdrawn -- RoySmith (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)