Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nichalp/Archive

Report date June 18 2009, 01:25 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

It is very great sadness that I am filing this report against an Editor whom I have respected since I joined Wikipedia through had very little personal interaction. has used a alternative account and edited using account which is now blocked and did | Paid editing and now appears to be using another account  .Please see this discussion  and also this where even other users seem to have same doubt and also this. joined Wikipedia on April 30th 2009 but is very versed to Wikipedia and knows his way through Wikipedia clearly showing he is not a new user.Whether it is policy or FAC clearly is not a new user.Hence given the context of Paid editing feel that issue needs to be looked into transperently.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Pharaoh of the Wizards


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * Nichalp will be stale, are there more recent suspects? Thatcher 02:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

This case is on hold pending arb com discussion. It is to be left open until then, with no further comments. Thank you.  Sy  n 01:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Please see this for ArbCom's decision. Icestorm815 •  Talk  18:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions