Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nicknameforgiven/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Sockpuppets of dewiki LTA DoktorPolyOnePolymer, confirmed per dewiki CU. fyi (as discussed ). DPOP (DoktorPolyOnePolymer) changed to a new sockpuppet when detected copyright violations  – one off many reasons why DPOP and his sockpuppets have been blocked in dewiki multiple times. Johannnes89 (talk) 13:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * As we now have a case of clear scrutiny evasion after copyright violations on enwiki, I have blocked and . Other accounts recently mentioned at de:Wikipedia:Checkuser/Anfragen/Surfvile, DoktorPolyOnePolymer are linked to enwiki accounts with 0 contributions. An enwiki checkuser should be able to identify some of these, and the case may need to be moved to the name of the oldest confirmed account. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * . MarioGom (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * The following sleepers are very :
 * Salvio giuliano 23:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please, block the sleepers, which are also confirmed in dewiki, as proven to the master. Given they have zero edits in enwiki, I'm not moving the case to the oldest account. MarioGom (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked & tagged. JBW (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Salvio giuliano 23:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Please, block the sleepers, which are also confirmed in dewiki, as proven to the master. Given they have zero edits in enwiki, I'm not moving the case to the oldest account. MarioGom (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Blocked & tagged. JBW (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2023 (UTC)