Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickz105/Archive

Report date November 2 2009, 04:40 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Very similar usernames. Nickz105 edited an article with vandalism, which Nickzboy later removed. GSK (talk ● evidence) 04:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by GSK (talk ● evidence)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by GSK (talk ● evidence) 04:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC) Bloody obvious. No CU needed. MuZemike 06:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Looking at the list of users, there could be some sleeper socks in there, but it looks like nearly all them suspected are. I'll sit on this for a day or two and take a closer look at those accounts. MuZemike 06:14, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * Sock indefinitely blocked and tagged. Sockmaster warned not to use socks or to vandalize again upon threat of a block. MuZemike 06:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Can't really find anything else worth blocking after checking last night on this. MuZemike 17:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Neither can I. Archiving. NW ( Talk ) 22:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)