Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nidhitaparia/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
New user, who after several small edits went straight to creating Draft:Namita Thapar, (which I have draftified due to obvious UPE concerns), which was created by the spa sockpuppeteer.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing as they haven't edited in about a month and the alleged master has been blocked for two years. More likely outcome is it is someone else who is promoting the subject and not the same person. If the disruption reoccurs, take to ANI. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
It's always conspicuous when new editors work on draft articles. Especially articles which have a history of paid editing. All three of these potential socks have touched Namita Thapar at this point. I think it's worth taking a look at them.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This SPI just led me to a rabbit hole involving two other SPIs, a large sock farm, a possible even larger sock farm, a lawyer, a judge, and Commons, but I think in this case it's just a case of multiple unrelated editors watching Shark Tank India and attempting to create articles for the sharks. Regardless, it's still suspicious enough for a check, so to compare the three accounts. DatGuyTalkContribs 23:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Sadly, this is too difficult to make heads or tails of with CU. There are some proxies used also. -- Amanda (she/her)  21:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Odd, but they're all stale and nothing concrete. . DatGuyTalkContribs 23:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)