Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niezwmxa Boro/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ per Bbb23's check:
 * Mike V • Talk 16:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Mike V • Talk 16:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Mike V • Talk 16:36, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar username to User:Niezwmxa Boro and exact same userpage biography (1, 2) as previous sock User:Br. Nijwmsa. McGeddon (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indeffed ad tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar username, joined Wikipedia half an hour after the previous sock was blocked, recreated Chandan Boro. McGeddon (talk) 12:57, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * GABgab 03:40, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user awarded a barnstar to Niezwmxa Boro sock account. In addition, both are involved in editing the Bodo grammar article, and both accounts have a history of creating inappropriate pages. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * In addition, it appears that this user's username is basically the suspected master's username in Hindi. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Katietalk 15:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry to jump the queue, I didn't see there was an SPI until after I blocked. This was obviously Nijwmsa, so I blocked indef on that basis, per a report at AIV.  I didn't know there was a longer sock history. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:30, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. There are sleepers. Hang on. Katietalk 15:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)


 * These accounts are ✅ to each other:


 * There are a couple of accounts that have no edits that are possible, but I'm not ready to list them yet. Blocked, and I'll let the clerks tag. Katietalk 15:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Marking as closed. Mkdw talk 00:14, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Almost the same username as past socks (eg. User:Nijwmsa Boro (WU)), and the user starts by immediately messing around with invalid templating on their user page (eg. 1, 2). Also tinkering with a user template belonging to a user that a past sock was barnstarring. McGeddon (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ and blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Closing. GABgab 17:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This user filed a request at WP:CHU/S asking to be renamed to "Níjwmsa Boro"; AntiSpoof revealed it to be too similar to "Nijwmsa Boro`", which is a confirmed sock. Their current username is also similar to, another blocked sock. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 18:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU wasn't useful here, but the behavioral evidence is very strong, and I blocked and tagged the account before I saw this. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)