Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nijam122/Archive

02 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The IP is a SPA account whose only edit is to Articles for deletion/Haqqani Anjuman. Similar ESL grammar limitations in sentence construction lead me to the assumption the IP is a sock of the other account.  Pax 09:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Did you mean to say, a member of the Arbitration Committee, is the sockmaster, or did you make a mistake in the form? If you're accusing these accounts of being operated by the same person just because they all happened to take an opposing view to you in a deletion discussion, you should promptly reconsider. Ivanvector (talk) 01:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Pax 04:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm closing this case. How we prove a sockpuppetry when the IP made only one edit, and that one is not characteristic in any way. says that the "IP is a sock of one of the two other named accounts who also participated", so even he is not sure who is the master. The fact that he originally accused  of being the master shows that the only reason this was filled is because user voted same way at WP:Articles for deletion/Haqqani Anjuman. That is not enough to prove anything.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  02:03, 7 March 2015 (UTC)