Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nileshjambhulkar/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Nileshjambhulkar, ANDREWBLL, Junaid khan ale, Margosullivan, Rajjones12, Richarddev, and Samj39 were all blocked as socks based on behavioral evidence involving a deletion discussion last September, Articles for deletion/Kjiva, but without a formal SPI; I am including them here for completeness, with the oldest one as master. Now we have many new AfDs (and some other MfDs) on a walled garden surrounding the same subject: Articles for deletion/KJIVA, Articles for deletion/KJIVA discography, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder: The Gangster Rhymes, Articles for deletion/United Naxal Records, Articles for deletion/Me n Mah Beat, and Articles for deletion/Lifoti. Associated with these AfDs are the two new SPAs listed here:
 * re-created KJIVA and many of the other articles in question, and has contributed at the Lifoti AfD.
 * has edited only in this area, on three of the articles and a different three of the AfDs.

I'm not requesting checkuser because I think the behavioral evidence is clear enough, and the affected content circumscribed enough, for that not to be necessary. See also Sockpuppet investigations/BuickCenturyDriver for another sock contributor to one of the AfDs,, not listed here because I think they're unrelated. Another spa,, has been suggested as another sock based on contributions to Articles for deletion/Lifoti and User talk:Ligard39 but I also didn't list this one because it looks dubious to me (maybe a sock from another case, but too many unrelated edits to fit the pattern). David Eppstein (talk) 02:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Listing Rockwalla39 after all after the checkuser results came back positive. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare to . All others are .  Vanjagenije   (talk)  09:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are a very match to each other:
 * Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * They're not even trying to hide it. Please block those three accounts. Thanks, GABgab 19:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing. GABgab 00:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing. GABgab 00:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)