Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nintenchris5963/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All the edits by the IPs are clearly the same as Nintenchris5963 (WP:DUCK). Nintenchris5963 was blocked earlier for making physical threats to myself and was also edit warring to place less focus on the viewpoint characters, who happened to be male, and replacing them with a female character. Their reasoning was that they were "seriously sick of boys as main protagonists". —Farix (t &#124; c) 04:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
2601:641:100:D6AE::/64 range blocked for a week. I'll reblock for a longer period if there's more disruption from the range. Ping me if I don't notice it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The edit history shows enough quacking to indicate that this is the same person, including this comment on my talk page. Other evidence: —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * IP admits to being Nintenchris5963 and evading their block. —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The IP is already blocked, but it's a short block. If the IP becomes active again, you can leave a note on my talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Very much making the same edits in rearranging characters, often putting the female heroine in front of the protagonist or main character. I'll also note that the sockmaster has been blocked for a physical threat of violence directed towards me about a year ago over character order as well as edit warning. I believe that there is enough quacking here based on behavior evidence alone and that they are continuing their behavior using alternate accounts.

as unblocking admin. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:27, 26 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Addendum: After being inactive for several days, both accounts begin "talking" within less than a minute of each other. —Farix (t &#124; c) 03:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - To confirm sockpuppetry. The suspected puppetmaster has denied socking but I just don't believe it. Sro23 (talk) 02:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅. Blocked and tagged. That's a weird denial. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)