Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niqueco/Archive

19 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Two very old accounts, one new. All with very few edits, were inactive. The two old, one was inactive since march, the other since 2009. In just a few minutes, they all become active and participated in the discussion of renaming an article. Veeeery suspicious. Just check all the edits of the accounts on December 17, 2012. Neo139 (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It's clear that these three are interacting together on a talk page, which looks suspiciously like socking. But I don't think it's clear enough to block for ducking, given that it also seems likely to be meatpuppetting, or some other situation than plain socking. ( X! ·  talk )  · @198  · 03:45, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning to an ❌ call here, but could see another CU saying instead. Courcelles 07:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The way I see it, Pozzoe is ❌, and the other two are to be related. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:42, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Good thing I didn't block as sock then. Nothing left to do here. ( X! ·  talk )  · @578  · 12:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)