Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nixon2/Archive

11 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

For over a month I have been dealing with this disruptive user. They pattern is that they will upload a photo to commons from a nude calendar that some Australian women football players were in around a decade ago, then they will create an account here and add the image to one or more pages. This is a problem on two fronts, the copyvio as well as BLP issues. Initially I warned the user Tibtum74 and followed up with a block on August 5 but they have hopped from new account to new account after each edit so blocking doesn't solve the issue. The autoblock does seem to stop them briefly but the behaviour resumes afterwards.

I requested advice at ANI and was told that a checkuser should be requested in order to check if a rangeblock is possible to stop the disruption. Thank you. Camw (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus:


 * since is the oldest account. Range blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Tagged them all as socks of Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

26 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

From SPI page "... pattern is that they will upload a photo to commons from a nude calendar that some Australian women football players were in around a decade ago, then they will create an account here and add the image to one or more pages." 220  of  Borg 16:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This account did not upload an image and add it to the article. They did in fact create an account at Commons, but as far as I can tell, they never uploaded anything. They certainly didn't try to add the image here. Nonetheless, there are confirmed puppets in the archives who created similar articles but did not add an image. Therefore, based on duck, I've indeffed and tagged the account. I also deleted the article. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

26 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

As for Shibani.1977 220  of  Borg 16:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This account did upload an image and add it to the article. Based on duck, I've indeffed and tagged the account. I also deleted the article. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

04 July 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Only edits are to 'create'/edit pages of Matildas soccer players, esp. with details of their nude calendar. Appears to be Nixon2's only interest on WP. 220  of  Borg 20:43, 4 July 2014 (UTC) 220  of  Borg 20:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Sockmaster's only edits are to 'create'/edit pages of Matildas soccer players, esp. with details of their nude calendar. Appears to be Nixon2's only interest on WP.


 * This likely sock's only edits are to Matildas – A New Fashion in Football page about the actual calendar. 220  of  Borg 21:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Only edits are to 'create'/edit pages of Matildas soccer players, or related pages, esp. with details of their nude calendar. Appears to be Nixon2's only/major interest on WP. 220  of  Borg 21:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Only existing edit is to Matildas page, with 'explicit' details of their nude calendar photoshoot. Talkpage notices indicate they also created Traci Bartlett page, deleted but now recreated.
 * The Matildas and their nude calendar appears to be Nixon2's only/major interest on WP. 220  of  Borg 21:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Only edits are to 'create'/edit pages of Matildas soccer players, esp. with details of their nude calendar.
 * Recreated Traci Bartlett page after speedy deletion. Initial creation of page by another apparent sock.
 * The Matildas and their nude calendar appear to be Nixon2's only/major interest on WP. 220  of  Borg 21:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following are ✅ & blocked:


 * . Tiptoety  talk 17:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * - Four cases combined into one., for future reference, please simply add suspected socks to the open case rather than using Twinkle to create additional cases. Thanks. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:39, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Point taken. I was looking for the 'Add another suspected sockpuppet' field in Twinkle/ARV/Sockpuppet, as there is in the Twinkle/ARV/Sockpuppeteer - 'Open SPI report' part, but it appears there isn't any.
 * • I presume I can add users to an open case by editing manually and adding:  to the list?--220  of  Borg 02:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Twinkle is great for some things, but reporting multiple separate sockpuppets isn't one of them, sadly. Cheers. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:17, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay :-) Only my 2-3rd SPI report btw. I may make a few feature suggestions on the Twinkle page. --220  of  Borg 03:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)