Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Njsnojdgnrj/Archive

15 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

See articles Anita Ose, Paša Zirgs and Pa$a Zirgs. Ben Ben (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have added Anitaose, another SPA on Anita Ose. JohnCD (talk) 10:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I've added two more, AnitinjaOsiite and Anituciitis. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 18:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I must say I'm very surprised. I have done nothing related to these articles and the lack of proper edits on english wiki are because I'm mainly a Latvian wikipedian Khermanis (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The first version from Anita Ose as well as File:Picture of Anita Ose, 2010.png came from your account. You should change your password asap. Same advice as you got on lv.viki. --Ben Ben (talk) 19:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I have already done that. Hope it helps and there will be no more problems. Khermanis (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Khermanis seems to have been a reasonably competent editor, so maybe CU will shed a light on possible impersonation or a compromised account, because this behavior is definitely abnormal. King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No it won't - everything else that Khermanis has done is . WilliamH (talk) 00:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * WilliamH
 * But if Khermanis's current IP matches the other accounts, then we know he is either socking or compromised, which are both grounds for an indefinite block. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Even Khermanis's recent edits are not obvious vandalism: his version of Anita Ose was non-notable but only suspicious because of the swarm of SPAs that re-created the page next day, in versions that may have been intended as jokes but were quite unacceptable. The four listed socks are clearly socks or meatpuppets of each other and should stay blocked. I agree with KoH that it would help to know whether Khermanis' IP matches theirs, but we could (a) wait to see what, if anything, he does next, or (b) leave him out and rename this SPI for Njsnojdgnrj, the first-created of the others. JohnCD (talk) 10:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Interesting statement from one of the sockpuppets (AnitinjaOsiite): . --Ben Ben (talk) 19:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Request to clerk: I am inclined to believe Khermanis that he is not involved. Can we eliminate him and rename this under Njsnojdgnrj, the oldest of the group of undoubted socks? JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Support that. I'm the initiator of this case. --Ben Ben (talk) 22:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * SPI moved. The ones listed have already been blocked as ducks, so closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)