Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nk.gibson/Archive

11 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Evidence:


 * Accounts were created within similar time of each other, and have edited the Cheltenham Township page only multiple times:
 * List of edits by Nk.gibson:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nk.gibson
 * List of edits by CheltenhamTwp:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/CheltenhamTwp
 * List of edits by 74.113.110.1:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/74.113.110.1


 * The edits have all been retractions of my edits, which I'm not sure why the edits have been retracted (all are basis of fact).
 * The edits have all been regarding similar statistics, particularly about the population density and demographics of the Township
 * Edits were all in similar timing and in grouping of each other (i.e. easy transition between accounts)
 * Below are links to some of the differences, note the similarity of content removed each time and time difference between edits:
 * Removal of a picture I took of rowhouses in Cheltenham which is not only a removal of factual evidence, but is the main subject matter user is attempting to remove (with 74.113.110.1 IP account)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=612394575


 * More taking out of similar subject matter (with Nk.gibson account)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=611576840


 * Removal of my Cheltenham Collage in infobox (with CheltenhamTwp account)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=612264386


 * Removal of my other infobox picture (with Nk.gibson account)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=611711012&oldid=611669856


 * Here is a link to the revision history of the entire page, note the differences between edits between the 3 accounts (74.113.110.1, Nk.gibson, CheltenhamTwp)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cheltenham_Township,_Pennsylvania&action=history


 * Summary: there is no way multiple users would have edited the same page, same content, within the two day span all of this editing has happened. It would be all too much of a coincidence and given the fact that the same information has been removed by multiple accounts within hours of edits, I am almost certain these accounts all belong to the same person. Peetlesnumber1 (talk) 20:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Based on duck, I blocked the master for two weeks, indeffed the named puppet and tagged the account, no action on IP. Close.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)