Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/No-genius/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Duck. Adding the same libellous content to Nick Cohen. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Myoctopusteacher has also created a sock attacking Nick Cohen in the very name, User:Nickcohenisaghost, for which I've blocked Myoctopusteacher for a month. Of course if they're a sock of No-genius, that needs to be upped to indef. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC).
 * You forgot to block the octopus.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:20, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * See, that's the problem with personalised block notices; I will forget to add the actual block. Rectified. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC).
 * @Bishonen Myoctopusteacher is ✅ to No-genius. I'll let you take it from there.  But before you go all indef on them, ask yourself, "What would octozilla do?" -- RoySmith (talk) 23:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid she's No genius, Roy. Bishonen &#124; tålk 06:46, 19 July 2022 (UTC).


 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * , what about ?--Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I thought that one was obvious from the user creation log. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I've never been totally sure how that works. I thought it was possible to create another account for someone but not have access to that account. Maybe that's only for so-called "account creators" and not others? In any event, I've now tagged the account.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe those show up like this -- RoySmith (talk) 00:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)