Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NoNDeSCRiPT/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Azure is topic banned from BLP and indef blocked for repeated violations of WP:OUTING. I have already blocked RhoNuPsiDelta based on behavioral evidence but I am filing this in the hopes that a CU can check for more accounts.

100% of RhoNuPsiDelta's article space edits are to the same articles edited by Azuresky Voight. They have the same peculiar interpretation of BLP and attack pages. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 06:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

A threatening e-mail from Azure has confirmed that I was correct about these users. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 07:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * What should we do about this? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * By the way, the sockpuppet has been locked 2 days ago. So now what should we do about this? Should we close it? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * for sleeper check per filer. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Salvio 17:34, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Behaviorally, NoNDeSCRiPT and Azuresky Voight have substantial similarities: The behavioral evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the NoNDeSCRiPT and the Azuresky Voight accounts are operated by the same individual. Both of these accounts and the sockpuppet have already been blocked for various reasons, and I am filing this report to have this SPI page recognize NoNDeSCRiPT as the oldest sockpuppeteer. —  Newslinger  talk   00:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Editing the RJ Nieto article to portray the article subject more positively, e.g. Special:Diff/845368035 and Special:Diff/1037293580
 * Editing the Mocha Uson article to portray the article subject more positively, e.g. Special:Diff/844952623 and Special:Diff/1038409234
 * Editing the Mocha Uson Blog article to portray the article subject more positively, e.g. Special:Diff/818901467 and Special:Diff/1039024841
 * Editing the Rappler article to portray the article subject more negatively, e.g. Special:Diff/820903964 and Special:Diff/1038792156
 * Editing the Maria Ressa article to portray the article subject more negatively, e.g. Special:Diff/820868095 and Special:Diff/999659877
 * Repeatedly harassing, including with personal attacks severe enough to be suppressed, e.g. and

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . —  Newslinger  talk   00:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Would a clerk please move this investigation to recognize as the original sockpuppeteer, and adjust the user page tags on the blocked accounts to link to the new SPI page? Thank you. —  Newslinger   talk   00:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Case moved. Tags adjusted. Closing. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)