Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noel Jarloc/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Per Commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Noel Jarloc This user has been confirmed as a sock. (1), (2) HurricaneEdgar    08:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - No CU needed since commons confirmed. -- Amanda (she/her)  09:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Was just blocked by for DUCKy uploading of copyright violations (see commons:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Noel Jarloc). Given that the sock was created in March, I think a check for sleepers may be worthwhile. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC) Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Whoops, this is a duplicate of the above case. However, I do believe that CU for sleepers is advisable. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * This sock was created in March (right after Noel Jarloc was warned for disruptive editing here and for copyvios on Commons), and began editing here and on Commons immediately after Noel was blocked on Commons. To me, that says this was a backup account created in anticipation of block evasion. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It appears that Girth Summit left the comment on the talk page of, who has some editing overlap but may or may not be related. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hmm - looks like I screwed up. Not sure how that happened, I'll look into it tomorrow - no time just now. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:11, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * the master account isn't blocked on this project. Is either the master, or the sock, doing anything disruptive on this project - any edit warring or similar? I only see one account from the sock account, which could in all good conscience have been a mistake on their part. They were blocked on commons for copyvio, which is a problem, but it's not like vandalism or harassment - any indication of similar problems here? Girth Summit  (blether)  15:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  15:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I've left a note for the user on their talk page, we'll see what they say. Girth Summit  (blether)  13:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
 * , forgive me if I'm missing something but I don't see any posts by you on either account's talk page. Spicy (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for flagging this up, and for identifying where I actually left the message - I don't understand how I managed to make that mistake, I can only assume that I mislicked somewhere in the article's history, and probably had too many tabs open at the time. Anyway, I've apologised to Cortezjayel.
 * Looking again at Noel Jarloc, I see that they have created another sockpuppet,, despite their block on commons. I'm no longer willing to AGF on this, especially since they have been warned about copyright violations on this project - blocking them, and the socks. Girth Summit  (blether)  23:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)