Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noggyjoggy/Archive

18 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User Noggyjoggy first came to the attention of anti-vandal editors in August 2014, when he made a series of edits across numerous Nickelodeon articles, claiming that a series called "Crossovers" was in the works that would be a conglomeration of all of the favorite characters from Nickelodeon, etc., etc. This was a hoax fan project, and the "project" amounted to a few sloppy, childlike scribbles on DeviantArt (see for the link), which the user called storyboards.

After being indeffed, user returned as Noggyjoggy2 and did the same thing:  The obvious name similarity is obvious.

In the most recent spate of disruption, Doggyjoggy returned to promote this same hoax/fan project:  Again, the obvious name similarity is obvious. User has also graduated to unsourced rumor mongering and probably needs to be indeffed again. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:24, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Addendum: MER-C was kind enough to add the vandal's DeviantArt page to the spam blacklist, which will hopefully dissuade future vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I think the evidence is more than sufficient and since I don't suspect additional accounts, I don't think a checkuser is necessary. The accounts have been blocked and tagged. Mike V  •  Talk  18:47, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

19 November 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious name similarity. User has only made one edit, so behavior evidence is not quite here yet. Can we put the investigation on hold for a bit? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Despite there being only one edit, the similarity of the username, the similarity of the editing interest, and the similarity of the nature of the editing are enough to convince me, so I will block the account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

23 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Spamming his Deviantart scribbles to kids' TV articles. Somehow he slipped through the spam blacklist. Account has already been indeffed. Adding new account completeness. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Consider it complete. I've tagged the latest puppet. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

17 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sockmaster kept trying to force a hoax about the revival of various 90s-era Nickelodeon (and other) shows to be hosted on Youtube, usually supporting the claims by adding a reference of a poorly drawn drawing of his hosted at DeviantArt. Although he is using different links (likely because Moses1996.deviantart.com was added to the spam blacklist) Cartoonsman96 has attempted to resurrect Dexter's Laboratory, Hey Arnold!, Rugrats by pointing to a different DeviantArt account. The links 404, so it's not quite clear if the content matches his MO, which is why I'm requesting a CU. There is a possible intersection with KuhnstylePro, particularly at The Tom and Jerry Show (2014 TV series). Kuhn was active there recently as Monkeyroccos. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The link that says is now 404, was working when I reverted at several articles, but is now a deactivated account. It was rather elaborate and gave the impression of being "official". I haven't had experience with this editor before so I don't know if this is consistent with the editor's MO. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. I'm endorsing because of the possible intersection with Sockpuppet investigations/KuhnstylePro. As an aside, although not precisely the same page, Cartoonsman96 did cite to deviantart.com in a couple of articles. One more thing that's different from Noggyjoggy's previous socks is the user name, but maybe he's expanding his horizons.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * for Noggyjoggy, technically unlikely to be related to KuhnstylePro. -- Versa geek  18:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged the account. Mike V • Talk 18:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

06 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Still disrupting kids' TV, per this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Similar username, similar edits to similar articles (The Fairly OddParents was and its seasons were adited by both master and previous socks). , admin needed to act.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * if you think the're worthwhile. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  20:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)