Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noi98/Archive

Report date May 3 2009, 04:17 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 

This apparent sleeper account appears out of nowhere to vandalize my user talk page, and right after the main account is blocked as well.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  04:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Requested by —  Dæ dαlus Contribs  04:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users
 * I've blocked both accounts, but neither indef - yet. Clearly related.   Acroterion  (talk)  04:22, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd like to point out that IP 99.23.81.101 may also be related as this IP has similar editing patterns and was recently blocked. —  Σ xplicit  04:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * IP added.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  04:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Checkuser is required for rangeblock potential, this user is obviously able to evade blocks.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs  04:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Checkuser not required to connect the accounts, that seems straightforward. Endorsed to determine the feasibility (and usefulness) of a rangeblock. Nathan  T (formerly Avruch) 14:46, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ all. I suggest you hardblock the IP and see how it goes. -- Luk  talk (lucasbfr) 20:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Blocks all around courtesy of  Tiptoety  talk 04:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)