Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NonReproBlue/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New account (Sept) that immediately and somewhat miraculously has an exceptional knowledge of Wikipedia lingo and methodologies. Has been reverting edits on police violence related pages and other controversial pages. Clearly a sock puppet account from an experienced editor. Colinmcdermott (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
do you have any specific evidence that would indicate that this is a case of WP:BADSOCK? We don't block users, and much less run CheckUser on them, just because they seem suspiciously clued-up on internal jargon and policy. I haven't investigated their behaviour at all, so have no comment on their conduct - if they are being disruptive, consider reporting elsewhere. If you can't provide specific evidence of illegitimate socking, there's nothing we can do here. Girth Summit  (blether) 14:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * (Note that I have changed the name of the case so that NonReproBlue is the master - 'not sure' is a real account that has never edited, I don't think you meant to imply that they were the master here. Girth Summit  (blether)  14:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC))
 * In the absence of any further evidence being presented, I'm closing this. If anything emerges in the future a new case can be raised. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Girth Summit, this is the most inept SPI I've ever seen. Drmies (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , yep, it was a bit of a shambles! Girth Summit  (blether)  17:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)