Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nora Lockshin/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New account shows up and in first edit casts a !vote at Articles for deletion/Hroswitha Club using very similar sorts of reasoning (and style) to the (perhaps) puppeteer. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Hi! Accused party here! Awoke to an accusation of being/acting as a sock puppet, and that my talk page had been blanked and restored! I am not too perturbed, as the imagery is a charming and delightful way to learn about Wikipedia shenanigans and support tools and actions, and also that my article has been significantly improved by new contributors overnight! I neither know User:Sehovde who made significant contributions, nor User:Punkandpoetess (who made the supportive comment but appears to have been deleted due to new user mistakes/inadequate info?) but appreciate their work here, as I have also learned new information about the subject. I see that there is a Clerk involved, who has perhaps used the CheckUser tool to confirm different IP addresses and validity of contributors. Looks like other folks are chiming in on the article improvements on the AfD page, so that is cheering. Lastly, if it holds water, through the magic of diff pages (nice suggestion!) you can see the desiderata for improvements to the Hrosvitha page by creating a page for Hroswitha Club was on my to-do list (diff page) beginning as a form of notekeeping in my Sandbox since 2016.--noranoodle (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * All fair enough and it's why I hedged my statement more than I normally would when filing here. I readily admit that the community might decide you're right about the notability of the club. But the circumstances here - first edit of newly created account using roughly similar layout of argument raised my eyebrows. I had thought nothing odd about this whole patrol - page moves get messed up and frequently the creator of an article I nominate for deletion will express their reasons why I'm wrong at AfD with some passion (and I know I get passionate about my article creations) - until the weird business with the new account happened. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:05, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. The learning curve of the intricacies is continual, while continuing to enjoy the growth of article with a life of its own. Best, noranoodle (talk) 22:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Please move. The correct name for the master is .--Bbb23 (talk) 01:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - ✅.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Cabayi (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Punkandpoetess' !vote says neither keep nor delete so isn't really a vote, just a comment. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 14:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)