Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noradd/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This involves the deleted article DigitGaps, the AfD of which I closed as delete. Brisk.mgt and Abigali970 were involved in writing that article and also promoting it elsewhere. Shortly after the deletion nom, Sallynathalia started going around deleting other data services company articles by blanking. That account was blocked and subsequently Danielgc92 went about PRODding those articles. A COIN discussion was started on this with evidence that there was a related off-wiki campaign. Samwiki2001's first edit was to blank that discussion. There's obviously some form of socking involved, but based on the discussion on the COIN board it could be more than one set of socks and/or linked to other accounts, therefore I'm requesting CU. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  15:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * The oldest account is Noradd.
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 3 – the following accounts are ❌:
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Groups 1, 2, and 3 are ❌ to each other.
 * I propose the following. I will move this case to Noradd. I will create another SPI with the socks in Group 2. I’d have to go through the accounts to see which one is the oldest (I’m kinda worn out at the moment after completing this check). After I've done those things, I will block and tag the accounts. Before doing that, I'd like to hear from to see if he agrees with my proposal. As an aside, a lot of the behavior of the Group 2 socks reminds me of Orangemoody.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Egads,, I did not expect such a huge list. I've only seen the OM stuff from the periphery and have been involved in a few deletions and it does look a bit like that from that. At this point I think the approach outlined by you is the best course of action here. I'm also not sure what to make of Group 3. For what it's worth, I think is the oldest account in group 2. Also, while going through the accounts I noticed a pattern -- usually 2-4 accounts are created together (within a few hours of each other), so we're likely missing some more on the older account creation days due to inactivity. I'm also letting  know about this since he was the one that identified the off-wiki problem at COIN. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  01:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)