Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NotHelpingMatters/Archive

14 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Kinda ducky, NotHelpingMatters says image is needlessly graphic IP says image too graphic NHM was kinda obsessed with removing this image and was blocked indefinalty for the disruption he caused in edit warring it out of the article. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Many readers might object to an explicit image, so a single removal isn't really indicative of sockpuppetry. "Graphic" is a fairly common word one might use to describe such an image, so its presence in both edit summaries could be a coincidence. Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:04, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

17 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * In the past month User:NotHelpingMatters was blocked for constant harassment and edit waring related to the article Futanari and it's header image (noticeboard entry).
 * The user continued as the previously suspected IP 70.112.2.185 and his sock ProgressionalStandards which were indefinitely blocked for the same reason, resulting in the page to be semi protected as well. The IP 174.88.1.80 might have been involved as well, but wasn't blocked.
 * Just one the same day (9 December 2013) another new user named Crimsonhexagon appeared, continuing the story (New entry on talk page of Futanari), but not editing the page (semi protected, new users need to be autoconfirmed first), being directly used to Wikipedia (not the typical new user). So i might question if he is not just another sock of the previously blocked user, just being unable to edit the page directly. ／人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人＼  署名の宣言 19:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Not a sock, previous was obsessed with removing one pic, this account has not mentioned it. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure? I see only one topic/goal: "Removal of the image in question". -- ／人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人＼ 署名の宣言 20:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * PS: Jumping on the train and removing the image in question with the comment "remove shitty image" is not very helpfull at all. Are you trying to troll? -- ／人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人＼ 署名の宣言 22:01, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Note: I've moved this here from Sockpuppet investigations/Crimsonhexagon and fixed the master accordingly. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Barely met my threshold but there was some extraordinarily similar reposting. A check found them to be ❌ NativeForeigner Talk 03:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing without further action. Note that the master, ProgressionalStandards, and 70.112.2.185 are all currently blocked. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)