Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Notabede/Archive

13 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility
 * Evidence:
 * Unfitlouie and Notabede have both edit warred on Aadhaar making the same edit:
 * Diffs of Unfilouie doing so:, , ,
 * Diffs of Notabede doing so:, ,
 * Both accounts were created within 3 days of each other in September:


 * Both appear to be WP:SPA editors focusing solely on Aadhaar-related articles.
 * Each is primarily active while the other is blocked and blocking one seems to be a trigger for the other to become active:
 * Notabede was quite active on these articles until s/he was blocked on December 5. During this time Unfitlouie was relatively inactive.
 * Beginning December 5 when Notabede was blocked, Unfitlouie became active on Aadhaar-related articles.  Notabede remained dormant after unblocking on December 22 until
 * Unfitlouie was blocked on January 12 and Notabede became active once again
 * Notabede is advocating specific positions taken by Unfitlouie.

Note that both editors have now been blocked and have been told that they may contribute evidence in their defense on their talk pages (which should be transcribed here). Toddst1 (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * It appears DeltaQuad has changed Unfitlouie's block to indef after running a checkuser. It's not clear to me if CU showed the sock is Notabede. Toddst1 (talk) 20:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Since both accounts are blocked indef, I'm closing this now. It can be re-opened though if new developments emerge. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)