Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ntyhoney/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

has been blocked three times for disruptive editing and socking, all relating to articles that involve the Ahir community. Among the major concerns was WP:V. On 12 August they created Moonpur Thakran, which has connections to Ahir and was unsourced. Within moments of them finishing editing there, turns up to finesse the thing, and 10 hours later  expands with minimal sourcing.

The anon IP also appeared with a similar edit within minutes of Nythoney creating Khanpur Dagran.

Ntyhoney created Sanoda, Kotkasim some weeks ago, which 7thakar also finessed, followed soon after by the IP.

I appreciate that the IP might be 7thakar editing while accidentally logged out - but there is an intersect between the three contributors at the obscure village articles that is difficult to explain even allowing for that.

As an aside, Ntyhoney has also recently edited the Ahir article with exactly the same sort of problem as they have previously had, ie; failured to abide by WP:V and WP:INDICSCRIPT, and POV-pushing regarding a puffed-up claim that the Ahir are identical to the Abhira tribe. Sitush (talk) 19:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both IP users replaced the redirect at Ahirwati with an article, which was also previously done by Ntyhoney. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I added Sikhahir to the list above. Similar edits at Ahirwati and Ahir clans. Marked for checkuser but I think it is probably too long since. - Sitush (talk) 11:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I think from your comment that you meant to request CheckUser but the way to do this is to change the switch in the SPI case status code at the top of the report to "CU", so your request was not highlighted.
 * for the named accounts - I have added Pagal786, another editor making repeated moves at Ahir clans apparently against consensus. This is indeed too old to check against the previous reports, but please check the two accounts against each other. with respect to the IPs, which are also . Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 23:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar change of redirect to an article, and  and this by the Sock puppeteer. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sunnywonderful, Kpyadav15, and Vickyahir1670 per DUCK test. The SandDoctor  Talk 18:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)