Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nyudude/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

The Arnold Ehret article has a long history of promotional socking from red accounts and IPs that I have reverted over the years. Two new users CasSidhi and U.Anon.93 are obviously the same user or strongly related because they make exactly the same edit summary commentary and grammar on the Arnold Ehret article. Please see this diff which compares both edit summaries, both these edits were restoring old material.

There is another account Anaiyio that uses similar edits but is stale so I have not included it. I believe there is good behavioral evidence to link CasSidhi and U.Anon.93. Psychologist Guy (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Update Nyudude has recently restored the same self-published material that the other accounts added. You can look at this user's edit summary, it is the same lengthy response and writing style. I am convinced CasSidhi, U.Anon.93 and Nyudude are all socks or related in some way. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌ as far as checkuser evidence goes...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The technical evidence might say they're different people, but there is something weird going on here - only one had edited the Ehret page before, and the behavior (apparently gaming autoconfirmed through gnoming edits) makes me think long-game sockpuppet accounts. It's also strange that their edits to the Ehret article have essay-length edit summaries. I think we're dealing with some kind of meatpuppetry here., ECP'd the page. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)