Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OCsmileyeiiiiiiieeeedcxxxc/Archive

23 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Sock made exact same edits as parent account. -- Earl Andrew - talk 13:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * User:Dairyfarmer20 has made similar edits to the others, changing the spelling of curlers names. Compare to  -- Earl Andrew - talk 03:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

its not me im not sockpuppeting i swear — Preceding unsigned comment added by PIZZAPIZZAPOPS (talk • contribs) 22:42, 23 April 2016‎ (UTC)
 * Here are some examples of similar editing:
 * 


 * 


 * GABHello! 01:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * You need to provide diffs showing these "exact same edits", a couple of the master and a couple of the puppet.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * . Careful,, you're going to make it to easy for filers to avoid their burden of proof. Thanks, though.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologies, this is the first time I've done this. -- Earl Andrew - talk 02:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've blocked all the unblocked accounts but with no tags. If a clerk decides that the Group 1 and 2 accounts are most likely the same person, then this case would need to be moved to a new master and the accounts tagged. If not, the accounts would be tagged differently.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * All tagged as socks of OCsmileyeiiiiiiieeeedcxxxc (the oldest account). Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1:
 * I've blocked all the unblocked accounts but with no tags. If a clerk decides that the Group 1 and 2 accounts are most likely the same person, then this case would need to be moved to a new master and the accounts tagged. If not, the accounts would be tagged differently.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * All tagged as socks of OCsmileyeiiiiiiieeeedcxxxc (the oldest account). Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked all the unblocked accounts but with no tags. If a clerk decides that the Group 1 and 2 accounts are most likely the same person, then this case would need to be moved to a new master and the accounts tagged. If not, the accounts would be tagged differently.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * All tagged as socks of OCsmileyeiiiiiiieeeedcxxxc (the oldest account). Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've blocked all the unblocked accounts but with no tags. If a clerk decides that the Group 1 and 2 accounts are most likely the same person, then this case would need to be moved to a new master and the accounts tagged. If not, the accounts would be tagged differently.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * All tagged as socks of OCsmileyeiiiiiiieeeedcxxxc (the oldest account). Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)