Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OclandEagle/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

OclandEagle and Apaugasma's English is similar, also, OclandEagle and Apaugasma have both been interested by the Jabir ibn Hayyan article and want to edit it in the same way, with for eg, the removal of "father of chemistry" : ,. Besides, while Apaugasma has been editing Wikipedia for about 5 months, they are aware of much older threads, usually write the same kind of wall of text and support the inclusion of the same kind of content in the article. Please note that while OclanEagle has not edited the english wikipedia since 28 December 2019, Apaugasma are trying to use some of OclandEagle's edits to gain support now : . ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  09:38, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Apaugasma's concerns (that they are talking about below), have been dealt with here, here and here with the patrolling admin's comments here and here. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  00:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I have explained why I am aware of older discussions at the talk page of Jabir ibn Hayyan here. A CU will confirm what I wrote there. I know this is not the place for it, but do note this edit on Jabir's talk by a proxy that was later only used to support an RfC started by the filer of this case. Also compare the edit summaries of a proxy user who recently attacked me (,, , etc.) with the edit summary which prompted me yesterday to open a new talk page discussion. Apaugasma (talk&#124;contribs) 14:52, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - OclandEagle is . Closing without action, there is no violation of sockpuppetry rules here - even if these were the same person, Apaugasma was created about a year after OclandEagle last edited and OclandEagle was not under any sort of scrutiny or sanction, so there is no temporal overlap. I suppose that if they were the same person then using their past edits as evidence of consensus would be problematic, but I will WP:AGF that that is not happening here. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)