Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Odod135/Archive

Report date September 8 2009, 14:50 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

"Odad135" appeared after Odod135 had received two spam warnings, and posted the same commercial link to the same two articles. McGeddon (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by McGeddon (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

I added and a couple IP addresses which have been adding the same spam link over the last week or so. - 2/0 (cont.) 15:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users
 * Oded135 is already blocked for spamming. - 2/0 (cont.) 15:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Spammed site added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist, now indefblocked. Wknight94 talk  16:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

All registered accounts have been indefinitely blocked. I'll leave to the discretion of admins as to how to handle the IPs. MuZemike 18:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * IPs are stale; no action necessary. NW ( Talk ) 01:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Both User:Odad135 and User:Oded135 have been tagged as socks of User:Odod135. MuZemike 14:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Report date September 10 2009, 11:18 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Back with a new vowel to spam the Cat Flea article again. McGeddon (talk) 11:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by McGeddon (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

New sock indefblocked and page semi-protected. If checkuser can block an underlying IP/range, feel free to unprotect. Wknight94 talk  11:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

. I'd like a checkuser look into these accounts for sleepers and/or rangeblocks. Thanks. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 12:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Range/IPs are too messy to really find sleepers. No go on a range block as well. Brandon (talk) 00:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)