Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Off2riorob/Archive

Report date July 7 2009, 22:21 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Rebroad

--Rebroad (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * - Are there any suspected sockpuppets we can check against? There's a lot of work we'd need to do if we're to find out who this could be a sock of, otherwise. Steve Crossin    The clock is ticking.... 22:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Bad faith nomination, since Rebroad is edit warring with Off2riorob over two BLP articles. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Requested by Rebroad (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * - CheckUser is not for fishing. Tiptoety  talk 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Is there a suspected sock here, and some evidence perhaps? Nathan  T


 * Conclusions


 * I am closing this witch hunt as a bad faith attempt to win a dispute between Rebroad and Off2riorob. Tiptoety  talk 22:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Vexorg
I believe IP 173.120.203.243 is Off2riorob attempting to avoid being seen to edit war at article Rothschild family. Vexorg (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
I would have appreciated a note that this investigation had been opened. I think most regular editors know which general area I am located and it is not in the USA. For the check user, I have recently removed my previous objection to checkuser for such fishing type reports and now have no objection to being check usered at any time. Off2riorob (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
This wasn't a bad faith report by my self. I genuinely believed that the IP was an other editor trying to avoid a 3RR by logging out to revert. Vexorg (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Vexorg (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Appears to be a bad-faith report, as Vexorg and Off2RioRob are currently engaged in an article dispute. Checkuser is also not for fishing. TN X Man 14:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

per CU policy which states The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. You guys definitely seem like are in a content dispute.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 15:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)