Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Offend/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both appears to already know how to fight vandalism once the accounts are created.  I Need Support  :3 23:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Here some diffs for you then.


 * (by KB3035583). This user was created on March 21 at 19:04 UTC, and literally around 30 minutes later starts doing some anti-vandal work.
 * (by Offend). This shows something similar too. This user was created on March 13 at 15:40 UTC and literally an hour later the user started some anti-vandalism work.

Also,
 * (by KB3035583). This user created the userpage at the creation date.
 * (by Offend). This user also created the userpage at the creation date.

Notice how both of the userpages has them introducing themselves.  I Need Support  :3 02:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.
 * If your sole evidence is that both users know how to revert vandalism, I think you're going to need some more than that. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 00:08, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm returning this to curequest. I would personally decline here but I know CUs who may well decide to check. Best, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 18:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * - there is insufficient evidence to suggest a check is warranted. Closing with no action. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)