Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Officialblossomdoc/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Sockmaster was banned after making promotional edits on Draft:One_Life_to_Blossom_(film). Crybaby82 appears a month later and starts making similar edits to the Draft. Sockpuppet even added the same deleted image to commons. This looks fairly obviously like a sock, I'm not too familiar with the SPI process but I don't see why a CU is necessary. Noah 💬 15:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This would be enough evidence for a check, but sadly the older account is stale for CU purposes. I don't think it's enough evidence for a block, though. It could be someone who has an independent interest in the film. Yes they uploaded the same file to Commons, but it's the obvious file to upload if you're editing about this film. Furthermore the edit summary styles are different... not so different for it to be impossible that this is the same person, but it cuts against it. It could be someone who has the same COI, but unless they're editing at the direction of Officialblossomdoc, that still wouldn't be blockable as a sockpuppetry matter. If you have COI concerns, I would suggest reporting to COIN or AN/I. Closing. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 13:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)