Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ohare415/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per the talk page Talk:Nina Cuso, this is very clearly manufactured conversation by multiple SPA accounts, and possibly undisclosed paid editing. Andredoone very clearly attempted to game autoconfirmed (making and reverting edits like this and Ohare415 made quite an effort to get Confirmed privileges and to index the page. CU requested for sleepers. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 05:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - TNT❤ 09:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * All users ✅ to one another, could potentially be UPE? Leaving to admin/clerk to block and possibly tag. - TNT❤ 09:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * -  QEDK  ( 後  ☕  桜 ) 13:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged these all. Thought they seemed rather fishy. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Closing.  QEDK ( 後  ☕  桜 ) 06:40, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts opened June 6. Both quickly made 10 edits by creating or creating and deleting hyperlink brackets on random articles. In one instance, one user added brackets and the other deleted same. Once established, both have been single-article editors on Nina Cuso. Many of their edits have been reverted by me or another user, but the tag-team is persistent in adding inappropriate content and content not supported by the references. In the article's Talk and in my Talk, the editor Ohare415 has been disingeniously naive in claiming to be new to this. David notMD (talk) 13:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Procedural close. This is a duplicate of the report above. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Similar interest in Nina Cuso, this time at Draft:Nina Cuso (now deleted). Compare the help desk posts to some old deleted talk page edits of the master, and I think you can spot a behavioral idiosyncrasy. Checkuser to confirm. Mz7 (talk) 20:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)