Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ojanapothik/Archive

17 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User make the same edits to Flipora and uses the same language to describe other editors (eg. "malicious" for any edit they disagree with). Ojanapothik turned up soon after article was semi-protected and IP users were blocked. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 05:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC) They also make the same bizarre arguments that Microsoft and Semantec are incapable of keeping their websites up to date. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 05:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Funny, I was just thinking the same thing. I have a few more details: Both Ojanapothik and the IPs accuse those supporting inclusion of the malware info of being "competitors" or promoting some product of their own (Ojanapothik, 72.182, 50.184); both talk about sources "meeting the bar" (Ojanapothik, 107.77). Those diffs also show a similar style of language (e.g. beginning edit summaries with a capital letter and usually ending with a full stop). ekips39 (talk)  05:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

There are also these two diffs (50.184 and Ojanapothik, respectively) both asking about removing the AFD tag or closing the AFD. ekips39 (talk)  06:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * We won't link accounts to IPs. Any action taken will need to be based off of behavior. Mike V • Talk 15:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * IPs have not been used for five days. The master is already blocked and warned against sockpuppetry. Closing this now.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

17 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Like Ojanapothik only seems to come out when Flipora resembles anything other than advertising, and uses similar language. I'm always suspicious when editors who have never written on a talk page lectures other that they should writing "in detail" there. -- haminoon  ( talk ) 09:05, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Agreed. Here's a diff showing the typical use of "last clean version" (compare this diff from 72.182). ekips39 (talk)  18:57, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ojanapothik is to Jimmy0007. I've blocked the sock and gave a 72 hour block to the master account. Mike V • Talk 15:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)