Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ojy Okpe/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I noted sometime yesterday that an article titled Ojy Okpe now at; (Draft:Ojy Okpe) had been accepted at AFC. I kept my on this article because the sources appeared spurious, thus I commenced to use anti spam tools at my disposal & i immediately noted that this article had been under COI/spam Radar for over 10 years now. For starters the suspected sock master is also an SPA promo only editor for purposes of creating an autobiography. See. The suspected sock @ who is a WP:SLEEPER promo account with 27 edits coincidentally registered 10 years ago as well See Note that their very first edit shows precocious knowledge of editing Wikipedia, suggesting a (possible) previous account. The suspected sock would eventually reawaken after two years of hibernation (their last edit prior recently was in 2019) to create a draft article on Ojy Okpe. Furthermore an account named, was an SPA created solely to create an article on Ojy Okpe and move it to mainspace, their entire contributions greatly substantiate this see. I believe this to be a sock farm (meat puppetry). Furthermore I strongly believe wholeheartedly that the duck test might prove pivotal here. Celestina007 (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * / : Two of the three accounts have not edited in at least 4 years and therefore there is no checkuser data to compare. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * hasn't edited since 2012, since 2018. Whilst there's a shared interest in Draft:Ojy Okpe there's nothing conclusive and blocks after a 4 year hiatus are hardly preventative. Whilst  could very well be UPE, I'm not seeing enough to act here at SPI. Therefore, (whilst I hate doing this) I'd suggest that if there's conclusive evidence of UPE or COI editing then this needs to be managed in the relevant venue (WP:ANI or WP:COIN). . Thanks, --Jack Frost (talk) 21:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)