Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oleola/Archive

14 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Oleola requested unblock from two administrators and was rejected (after he was blocked for threatening us, only his point of view is good). He always reports if we do not agree with him. New Hitler he is. INSTEAD, he is using multiple accounts to stay connected on Wikipedia whilst he is blocked. Multiple accounts are not allowed anyway blocked or not. He always reverts edits and clears huge quantities of info. This user was warned before, multiple times. Multiple accounts are not allowed anyway. Świniakulturą (talk) 00:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Gelu is coming and reverting again after Oleola reverted and the good will user reverted Oleola who wanted to cancel his sourced writing. Multiple accounts are not allowed. Moreover Oleola used another two users whilst he was blocked. He requested unblock from one administrator. Then he did not want to give up, requesting from other two. Oleola was rejected again. Meanwhile he began using again his other users. He broke the rules, after threatening users. Gelu6, just like Oleola reverting the good edit of the same user just because he has last word. Oleola is connected on Gelu6 from time to time. The usual behavior and what have in commune all these four users is the same, they are linked: Wisła Kraków, African football players, Slavic football leagues and Spanish football players. Only these. It is more than obvious. I use Translator. Świniakulturą (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Using diffs to support your argument, please explain how the accounts belong to one person, and why CheckUser is necessary. WilliamH (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but all you have really done is describe a sequence of events. Other than that they edit the same articles, you have not explained how they are likely to be operated by one individual. I will leave this open for other eyes to consider, but as it currently stands, there is nothing to do here. WilliamH (talk) 13:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)


 * - after no answer. Rschen7754 07:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 15:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)