Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oluwa2Chainz/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

was created on 7 August with one of his three edits voting for keep on the AfD Articles for deletion/Koker (musician). also has similar edits like that of the already blocked. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 10:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I have blocked User:Choccitymusic1 and User:ChocCityMusic on username grounds. I'll have to note that Markzy90 is blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Coal Press Nation according to this SPI; at that time Obari2Kay was active but was not caught in the CheckUser check, so it's unlikely there's technical evidence connecting them. Huon (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you're yet to block User:Choccitymusic1. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obari2Kay is very to Choccitymusic1. However, Markzy90 is  to these two and is related to the group found here. I've blocked the master account for 3 days for sockpuppetry on the AfD. Mike V • Talk 18:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This edit shows requesting the undeletion of the Sugarboy article which has been deleted multiple times upon it's creation from both him and. Both have also !voted keep on the afd Articles for deletion/Dice Ailes (2nd nomination) another non-notable artist related to. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Like i said before time without number, i opened my wikipedia account as but i was instructed to change my username which i did, all i request is an IP check and also i would like to know; if some one give's an instance of a known artist Toby Grey with an unknown artist GEE JAY does that mean's he/she is promoting the name Toby Grey ?, just like  who also gives an instance about Mayorkun and Dice Ailes on the debate Articles for deletion/Dice Ailes (2nd nomination) does that also means she is also promoting Mayorkun?. I would love to know what giving instant got to do with promoting, that make's you quickly open an investigations on my account every time. Me and  have been involved in the unsuccessful creation of the Sugarboy article, that does not mean we are sockpuppet. I was not the only person who has been trying to create Koker (singer) if you can recall but i was the only person who has been able to provide reliable source to backup that article Koker (singer). I rest my case, sitting back an watching what the out come of the IP Check would be. Thank's --Obari2Kay (talk) 13:50, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I also believe that MKJ6006 is a sock of Obari2kay. I reported both users for sock puppetry on 2 March 2017, but the administrators who handled the case didn't compare the users to each other. This time around, a check user needs to compare the two. It isn't a coincidence that both users made attempts at re-creating the Sugarboy article.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 21:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * How can the ADF be close when it is clear an investigation is still going on which was a result of the article Dice Ailes, when it is clear. Also if i am to check that adf to my understand and also how it should be undergone i would Keep that article Dice Ailes not saying "The result was no consensus to delete" as "bd2412" did. Am not here to insult anybody but let us use commonsense to undergo this.

Let see how may Keep & Delete we have.
 * Walter Görlitz, TH1980, Myself said "Keep"
 * Celestina007, Ifnord said "Delete"
 * MelanieN, wasn't sure "Keep vs. Delete"
 * "Oluwa2Chainz" Redirect
 * Let not count "MKJ6006" because it is said to be a sockpuppet. Which is still up and running "Sockpuppet investigations".

If i was to add "MKJ6006" contribution, it would be.

But since it is a 50/50 possibility of it been a Sockpuppet and undergoing "Sockpuppet investigations" let not count "MKJ6006" contribution to the adf. That bring us back to 3 Keep, so i don't see why "BD2412" would close the adf with the word "The result was no consensus to delete". Look into this, i feel their is a conspiracy in this.--Obari2Kay (talk) 07:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * "BD2412" has explained everything to me User_talk:BD2412, thank's for your time. I now understand where he was driving to .--Obari2Kay (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * from 's contributions, you'll find out that his first edits were on 5 open afd discussions. Quite awkward for a new user if you ask me. The Wale Ojo article he created is presently having an afd issue, same thing Obari2Kay has been having ever since he started editing on here. Their poor written English is another indication of sock puppetry. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * "" I advice you pick out your fact correctly not saying contributions, you'll find out that his first edits were on 5 open afd discussions. An you also answered yourself by saying "Quite awkward for a new user if you ask me". So it's normal for a new user, or are you trying to tell me when you joined Wikipedia, you where perfect?. An also the same Wale Ojo article you talking about, on the afd their are good responses. Don't forget their is also Wole Ojo, i checked  talk page an also saw it was also nominated, but on that afd you said "Keep as "Darreg" rightly pointed out. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)". Guest the user is improving, an please stop involving me with the name "MKJ6006".. I only write longer article, not to short as "MKJ6006" did and not about movies or actors/actress expect for the Big Brother Naija housemate Gifty Powers which got deleted. I am a huge lover of reality shows & music, let just say "Entertainment" expect for Nigeria movies and their actors/actresses. I write only about, singles "Hell Naw", the artist and the album, if i have one to write. I don't see any poor English here Wale Ojo & Wole Ojo so point out your fact correctly. Please look closely  you would see what am saying, thank's.--Obari2Kay (talk) 06:12, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two accounts are .--Bbb23 (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Please get your facts straight. "a check user needs to compare the two" - I've already done that. Second "the administrators who handled the case didn't compare the users to each other" - The CheckUser correctly found that at the time MKJ606 was .--Bbb23 (talk) 22:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Close because of inaction. Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both SPAs at Publiseer. Sock creates it and then master starts editing here. Both edit on different days. At the AfD both immediately chip in here and here. They admit they are linked here. If not socks then certainly meat. Looks very much like paid editing. Since originally posting, Oluwa2Chainz has suggested here that, and  are also potential socks. This would suggest that the master is Coal Press Nation. There are certainly some behavioural similarities with the editing of Bob276 editing here whi is a confirmed sock.  Velella  Velella Talk 10:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Please this is not possible. I've interacted with and can say with the highest degree of confidence that hes not. There's most likely a mixup somewhere. And none of the editors was given a chance to speak??? ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  03:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * That they share IPs is unquestionable. As an example, I have them on the same IP where one makes this edit and twenty minutes later, the other makes this one. That isn't a one-off...

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * - Given the evidence above, please check to confirm sockpuppetry and potentially a link to Coal Press Nation. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ and all using the same blocked proxy, too.
 * Given that the "tip" concerning Coal Press Nation came from the account who turned out to be the master, I'm not putting much credence in it. Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Several articles this user has created are Oluwa recreations and their edits indicate to me (from the start) that they were not a new user. See Publiseer.com, St. Chika. Most creations also follow a similar pattern where Sono creates followed by an SPA editing as well, see for example: Steveoduntan, Mascodigital, etc...

Also significant overlap here. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:10, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Indeffed,.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This seems to be some sort of meat puppetry/UPE spam ring as nearly every edit overlaps with this master and  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The suspected sock is not using proxies and they are in a different country from Oluwa2Chainz, far enough that I don't think this is directly related. Meat is possible. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:57, 14 September 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hasn't edited in a while and given the above, not enough to block here. If they continue making promotional edits, consider COIN or if bad enough AIV. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * See my comments below.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Created two perfectly formatted and referenced-bombed advert articles, for company Publiseer Digital Publishing and its owner Chidi Nwaogu.

The point here is that, Publiseer Digital Publishing was created at this title to evade two extant salting on Publiseer and Publiseer.com; the titles where the Master (and their socks) of this SPI tried in vain to create the article numerous times.

Moreover, the logo of the article was by, a confirmed sock of the master.

I just added another account. They re-created St. Chika, an article about the other founder of the Publiseer.com which was also deleted twice and had link with the master. They did this both here and on French Wikipedia. It's using the picture by ; another confirmed socks in this paid editing ring.

Both accounts have zero edit which is not directly-related to the above listed articles. –Ammarpad (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC) /
 * I am not a sockpuppet.--Ghanablackstar (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Djamillekibotto has been working on the St. Chika article for about a month and did comment that an article about the publishing company didn't exist and I got the impression that the editor planned to make one. The editor does seems to be thorough. I'm not sure that equates to paid editing or socking, but I'll let the check user do its work. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  22:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * TonyBallioni (talk) 21:57, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * And BH and I overlapped. I'll let him finish it. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ghanablackstar is to . He is also in a different place than the case master/meatpuppets. I'm inclined to block based on behavior as this is UPE or some form of promotion. This has been the subject of continued meatpuppetry. TonyBallioni, I'm finished and will let you proceed.
 * No need. I wouldn't catch anything you didn't: KrakatoaKatie and I were going through open cases and we marked it in progress before we saw you working. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I've indeffed all and see this as meatpuppetry to promote. Most precisely, the promoters have been from the specific countries named in the article that I just deleted. i.e. they are working for themselves. I'm going to block meatpuppets and delete these works from now on. This is attempted manipulation of Wikipedia.

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Since User:Timi422 joined Wikipedia, all the BLP's he has been creating has been for for topics previously deleted via an AFD discussion, and all the previous article creators have been blocked. DJ Kentalky (jockey) has been created/edited severally by many sockpuppets associated with the master sock and its currently salted. Timi422 has worked earnestly towards moving it to mainspace by visiting deletion review and submitting an AFC request. Within a space of one month, he has created article for an un-notable actress Abimbola Ogunnowo article twice. Laura Ikeji (an article recently created by Timi) was first created by User:MKJ6006 who is also blocked sock. He also included incorrect information in the article to make her seem more notable, and survive AFD Several un-notable songs, by the un-notable artist Odunsi (The Engine) has also been created by the master sock. In fact, the article was previously deleted here Articles for deletion/Odunsi (The Engine), where the master sock was !voted for it to be kept. The only other non-BLP was for Mr 2Kay discography, a disco article which follows similar format as other disco articles for the master, and Mr 2Kay is an article that the master significantly contributed to. As a former sock myself (many years ago), I know when an editor is evading a block to contribute to Wikipedia and when he is doing it illegitimately to edit COI articles, I am almost entirely sure this is the case of the latter. I just wish clerks will see reasons with me. Please note that he's an experienced editor so he knows what to say to keep his suspected COI articles in mainspace, and not be seen as a troublesome editor, by being in the good books of good faith editors. HandsomeBoy (talk) 07:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Its obvious you don't know me, because if you do, you will know that I will go an extra mile to ensure a knowledgeable editor interested in Nigerian content remains on Wikipedia. Infact I even try to overlook and stay clear if the issue is a minor one or my comments might instigate revoking their rights, which was exactly what I have been doing concerning your presence on Wikipedia, but you continue to create/significantly contribute to topics that are targets of same set of COI editors!


 * And this is simply about doing what is right. When I tell people online, that I am a very honest person in real life (Not trying to blow my horn, but I talk alot online), they might find it hard to believe because of obvious reasons, but that is for another day.


 * I'll rather spend my time on Wikipedia adding content than investigating another editor, which was why I hesitated opening this for so long. I mean the time I used in opening this case will be more valuable to me if it was invested in creating a film article, but the dissatisfaction I always feel when I see your contributions in my Watchlist was what compelled me to open this case. Even if there is no relationship between the two accounts (I still think you're a sock of someone), I will just move on; wish you good luck, hoping you will at least stop the COI edits, even if you want to continue socking. At least, I have done everything I could do within my power to restore sanity and ensure only legitimate contents are on Wikipedia.HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * First of all, am requesting for an IP check on my handle and an the sockpuppet handle as claimed by HandsomeBoy and also all the articles I have written so far met WP:GNG or WP:Music but HandsomeBoy kept on nominating them without a convincing reason or fact and as for "DJ Kentalky" please check draft (Draft:DJ Kentalky) the article is well written and it is still awaiting review for a month and some week now, an also the article met WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC Thank You.--Timi422 (talk) 13:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I am humbled hearing this from you "he's an experienced editor" thank you i feel really happy hearing this from you. Honestly i wouldn't call myself an experience editor but a good follower of WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC rules. To what you wrote above you making me look like we in competition here due to the way you sounded making it look like "SPI clerk" shouldn't listen to me but block me from editing. Like why, if you have a problem with me talk to me. Not coming over here to race a case when you can send in direct message on Wikipedia or write me on my talk page than deleting all my article and opening a false claim of a sockpuppet which I know nothing about. If being a troublesome editor make's you happy, then am in for trouble *Smiles*, also I want to know where it is written on Wikipedia whereby articles deleted many years ago can't be rewriting by someone else or writing it again automatically makes you a sockpuppet. I want to know HandsomeBoy please give me answers Thank You. --Timi422 (talk) 13:24, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Honestly I don't really care if you honest real life or fake life or on life or off life or social life or off social life, you haven't answered my question yet and that the problem with Nigerians they wouldn't give you a straight forward honest answer. Back to my question "I want to know where it is written on Wikipedia whereby articles deleted many years ago can't be rewriting by someone else or writing it again automatically makes you a sockpuppet. HandsomeBoy please give me answers.--Timi422 (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2018 (UTC)


 * You said something about "legitimate contents", my content are legitimate enough. Also their are editors who come on Wikipedia with head knowledge to write articles without reference without anything and cause a lot of damage like it was done to "DJ Kentalky" and many other articles here which is what bring the false alarm making anyone who wish to write on that article a sockpuppet. Also I write article's based on the fact it needed to be here on Wikipedia cause of the bridge they crossed and name they have built over the years and also they meet Wikipedia rules WP:GNG & WP:MUSIC, I have no business with "COI edits" you don't expect me to keep contributing to already made articles and not write something new. Like you restricting me from writing, then what is Wikipedia for if not to contribute by creating relevant articles and so on.
 * Like the most recent nomination you did Odunsi (The Engine) (2nd nomination) you can read the AFD and so far you the only person here on Wikipedia that want my articles deleted without a reason when clearly they meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC.--Timi422 (talk) 06:27, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checkuser comment: On review, it is  but not ✅ that Timi422 is a sock of Obari2Kay. The prior accounts are, so precise comparison is not possible, but there are certain clear similarities.  The greater challenge here is differentiating likely COI editing (which is a real possibility) and questions of geocentric notability (i.e., are the article subjects notable within their own country, but their comparative lack of notability in North America is driving the deletion requests?).  This latter possibility shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand, because it would logically lead to repeated attempts to create the articles, independent of any undisclosed paid editing.  I note that there are a fair number of differences between the previously deleted articles and those versions created by Timi422.  Recommend further review by an administrator experienced in user edit comparisons.  Risker (talk) 19:29, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I’ve reviewed the behavioral similarities with MKJ6006, who was the blocking CU believes was blocked as Oluwa2Chainz (asked Rob about this.) I find there are enough similarities in the editing style and communication style of these two users to justify a block, and that since the named master of this case is also a confirmed sock of Oluwa2Chainz, these similarities are difficult to overcome, even though no action was taken on the last report in this archive (the timeline of blocks/masters here being a bit complex. As such, the account is Can a clerk please figure out the tagging and fix these SPIs? I think a merge is probably needed, but I might be missing something. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Obari2Kay was confirmed to Oluwa2Chainz in Sockpuppet investigations/Oluwa2Chainz, and I don't understand why this is a separate case. We could merge it, if there are no objections. GABgab 16:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that would be best. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:59, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Since there are open cases at the Oluwa2Chainz SPI, I think merging might be a little tricky as of now... GABgab 21:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * GAB, whenever it makes sense to do it. I closed out the top one and BH just returned results on the bottom there. No rush. Thanks for all your help. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:49, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Cases merged, closing. GABgab 19:52, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Nearly identical recreation of 's St. Chika as St Chika, including uploading their photo and using the same exact template Praxidicae (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , too many similarities between St. Chika as St Chika. Clear WP:DUCK. St Chika also deleted as CSD G5. Closing. The SandDoctor  Talk 04:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I believe the editor is a sock master of this editor :  and is currently using this as a means to !vote on AFD’s such as this Right Here In this edit here - Evidence 1 creates an article titled David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi and in the subsequent edits to that article he establishes his modus operandi as per not using/rarely using the edit summary box; Such as in this - Evidence 2  & Evidence 3. We can see he rarely uses his edit summary box. Now a certain editor named joins the encyclopedia two months ago and from his edits, shows he isn’t a newcomer as he immediately begins to edit heavily on the David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi article, the same page created by  and exhibits same edit pattern by not using his edit summary box which we can observe in this -Evidence 4, Evidence 5, & Evidence 6. The editor also edits using promotional tones and writing patterns that makes article appear like a Curriculum Vitae/Resume just as does. Furthermore and more intersting is the editor acts as if it is a single purpose account as all edits made by the editor are related to the article created by , Now a current AFD is taking place - AFD of David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi & I believe sock master is using his other account which i believe is  to !vote. The fact that they exhibit same style of editing, same interest in the aforementioned article makes me believe may be using more than one account to edit the encyclopedia. Celestina007 (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I naturally would have love to stay silent without making any comment and let the process be completed but it’s important to shed some light here and also make understand that this is a clear hoax and watery. I created the article David Oluwatobiloba Adeyemi just like every other Nigerian articles that have created to make spotlights on great Nigerians who are definitely doing great things... I created this article on 15th of September 2019 as a stub as seen here then on 29 October, I reverted edits made by and  as I sensed it to be a conflict of interest as seen here; also immediately I dropped a message on both  and  talkpage about COI as seen here and here ... Furthermore, I reverted more of the edits by  due to COI and in promo tone as seen here and here until  came in... She inquired about me using  here as a sock on my talkpage and which I immediately explained to her and said NO. So it’s obvious that this is just a mixup and waste of process but still let a checkuser admin run the process as that will validate the truth here, also wish there can be penalty for users who initiate process like this and ended been non-true. Thanks Kaizenify (talk)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm busy at the moment but I thought I'd link this for checkusers and these two confirmed accounts from previous investigation: — Berean Hunter   (talk)  00:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Given the information posted by Berean Hunter above, the two accounts listed were confirmed to, which is older than the account. I'm going to move and merge this SPI case to the correct apparent master.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   23:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * They are using different devices and have a range in common. This case should be evaluated based on behavior.
 * could you clarify who they refers to? Chybels?  Imagekraft?  Kaizenify?  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Roy, They refers to Kaizenify and Teebabalola. Chybels and Imagekraft are ✅ socks of Kaizenify. For some history, see this thread and the ones that follow. Oluwa2Chainz is a different person than Kaizenify but they were meatpuppets and not just the two of them were involved.


 * Rechecked, and still no joy on any conclusive results. Based on the time this has spent idle, closing. ST47 (talk) 03:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)