Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OlympicFan/Archive

24 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK - Sleeper check. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  18:30, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sleepers and IP Block if we can. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  18:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No luck on an IP block. TN X Man  18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd also add to that list. Courcelles 18:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked by various admins and tagged. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Were done here. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

03 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Sockpuppet of OlympicFan Kante4 (talk) 23:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yeah, that's some great tautological evidence you've provided. I'm adding a CU to see if this is connected, and to find sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Quack, blocked, reverted, and tagged. Still would like sleeper check and for the record the confirm. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  03:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * - no serious history. AGK  [&bull; ] 09:13, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the reason for the decline. They're clearly the same person (e.g. they sign their posts in the same way) and the last time this case was run, four sleepers were found. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * We need an IP block, AGK, so I've ran it.
 * Found a rangeblock that should slow him down. Courcelles 22:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Found a rangeblock that should slow him down. Courcelles 22:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Found a rangeblock that should slow him down. Courcelles 22:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Found a rangeblock that should slow him down. Courcelles 22:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Found a rangeblock that should slow him down. Courcelles 22:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Courcelles. I've blocked and tagged Solo. France was already blocked as globally locked, but I've updated all the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

06 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

-- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Sleepers while I block these. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * If the IP isn't already ducked him, then note the autoblock kicked in for the IP right after I hit the user. --  DQ  (t)   (e)  19:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * No sleepers. Courcelles 19:39, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Marking for close then. TN X</b> Man  19:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

13 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Spam about totallympics forum David Biddulph (talk) 11:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Lets do one last sleeper check. But that's all we can do here. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  12:42, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * All of the named accounts are ✅, plus . No comment on any IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  15:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocks have been handed out; I updated the tags. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

31 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Spamming slwiki with ads for his forum again, also some activity here. — Yerpo Eh? 16:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

10 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Was blocked on sight by User:Materialscientist. — Yerpo Eh? 10:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

17 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

His edits are the same he made earlier to get people to his forum. 1 2 and so on... Kante4 (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Spam-only account indefinitely blocked. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2013 (UTC)