Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omar-Toons/Archive

06 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Revert-only account that has been inactive for over 2 years, only to become active again when Omar-Toons got involved in an edit-war at List of oldest universities in continuous operation starting January 2. Athenean (talk) 03:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The two appear ❌. TN X Man 14:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Given that the article is fully protected, I'm going to let this go for now. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

27 August 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same name with a difference of a capital letter Dzlinker (talk) 14:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * For information : (+ no block evasion + no contribs with the former account since Jul. 26th) --Omar-toons (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: Omar-Toons was globally locked last month due to "massive crosswiki edit-warring" and it looks like Omar-toons has engaged in similar behavior. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:14, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * No post-July 27th cross wiki edits. --Omar-toons (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I add false accusations, personal attacks "rv nationalistic PoV pushing (Bokpasa like)" , and disrespect of sources, it is writed "qui s’étendait, de la Moulouya jusqu'au sud de la Grande Kabylie" and not "from Tlemcen to the Chelif valley", and the same conflict on french versions.--Waran18 (talk) 12:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Looking by the above, this case can probably be closed. - Mailer Diablo 19:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Marking for closure, per MD. AGK  [•] 13:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The first two IPs (41.X.X.X) appeared within the last 48 hours and are targeting the same articles as Omar-toons with the same pov-pushing technique. Here's Omar-toons' edit and here's the IP's (similar edit summary and POV), and the same again (identical edits) on a different article. The last four IPs showed up after the user was indefed and exhibit the same behaviour pattern. M.Bitton (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * is behaving in a similar manner, reverting back to the reported IP's version and reintroducing some of the sockmaster's old POV (compare this edit to the master's). M.Bitton (talk) 20:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * From this point forward, I'll just add the new suspected IPs to the list below:
 * . M.Bitton (talk) 21:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * M.Bitton (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
 * M.Bitton (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * M.Bitton (talk) 19:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * M.Bitton (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * M.Bitton (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
 * M.Bitton (talk) 21:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * M.Bitton (talk) 22:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * None of these IPs can be linked to Omar-Toons, whose account was globally locked in 2012. Even if there was past IP/useragent information about Omar-Toons, it would not be valid four years later. It is entirely possible that one or more like-minded individuals are editing from dynamic IP addresses on this subject area; if their edits are truly problematic, a request for page semi-protection should be made. I note, however, that the "result" of that particular event has been the subject of dispute for 60 years, and it should come as no surprise that people from different parts of the world will disagree on its outcome, and will be able to find reliable sources to support their opinions. Risker (talk) 02:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)