Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omb-ec/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

bock evasion  d.g. L3X1  (distant write)  21:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

On April 25th Omb-ec vandalises Portaferry multiple times and picks up an indef from Oshwah for it. Today, brand new account Mao Ze vandalises the same article and another article. This smacks of block evasion except for the 2 week lag. That is why I requested CU. d.g. L3X1 (distant write)  22:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
 * 1) At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
 * 2) At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
 * 3) In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * but .--Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 15:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * - Same childish vandalism; seems evident enough. Thanks, GABgab 18:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocking and closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)