Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onepoint21GigaWatts/Archive

17 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ip user has been making repeated disruptive deletions of referenced material; there are often long periods of time between attacks which have been going on since about October. This behavior appears to be repetitive for the user, as he has been warned about such behavior in other articles. On one occasion identical deletions to those made by the IP user were made by a user "Onepoint21GigaWatts". These are the only edits this user has ever made, strongly suggesting a sock puppet.   Rushton2010 (talk) 23:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I don't see enough evidence of the IP and the named account being the same individual. Onepoint has made only a handful of edits, all on December 30, 2013. With the exception of one, all were to Capital FM Arena Nottingham. That article has seen quite a bit of disruption, not just from the named account and the reported IP but from other IPs. Then there was a single edit to National Ice Centre, one removal of information from the infobox that wasn't even reverted. It appears to me that the IP is disruptive (unlike the named account, they have a fairly long editing history), but you'll have to deal with that in a non-SPI venue.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree with Bbb's assessment. There isn't enough evidence to warrant blocking either the account or IP for sockpuppetry. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)