Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onoja1/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Looks to be SPAs created to !vote on []. All were created within a few minutes of each other. CU requested to check for other users who may try and add to this as well as to confirm linkage. - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 13:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I don't know if this is how to defend myself appropriately.

I have just one account. I created it a year ago. Any other account connected to be should be the ones I created long time again while I was struggling to understand how account is created here. I suspect attempts to frustrate my articles or possibly political attacks coming from my country, possibly because of the role of the subject ahead of the 2023 election.

I have been working tirelessly to master editing here and have standard articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onoja1 (talk • contribs) 6 October 2022 (UTC)  Moved misplaced comment  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other with proxy use:


 * Rest are due to probable proxy use but all accounts (including above) geolocate to the same country. Babzpee and Onoja1 are from the same /16. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * noob SPI patroller question, sort of odd conclusion to make but my standing is that, , and are all the same person while trending towards the relation with  being meatpuppetry rather than sockpuppetry (but still a possible alt master. Is that how it works?). How do I tag/play this? DatGuyTalkContribs 15:53, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @DatGuy, hi. There a few ways to tag this as you feel best. Officialtonnie is the oldest account of those three.
 * You could tag Officialtonnie as a confirmed master, Twikipe as a confirmed sock and Babzpee as a proven/suspected sock (both as socks of Officialtonnie).
 * You could follow the first sentence in 1, but add as the alt-master Onoja1 as either suspected/proven to all three accounts.
 * If you follow 1 and think that Onoja1 is not connected, you could ask for this case to be moved to Officialtonnie. The alt-master tag can be used in situations like this. I would recommend that if you feel there has been coordination to follow 2, and if you think Onoja1 found the AfD independently of the three other accounts then leave without the alt-master tag. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I did it right. Closing. DatGuyTalkContribs 17:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Just checking—haven't looked into the facts of this case—is the lack of a block/warning for Onoja intentional here? --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 17:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * no, it isn't. Feel free to take the action you feel appropriate towards Onaja1. DatGuyTalkContribs 17:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, you closed this, and like I said I haven't reviewed this myself (and for that matter don't have time to at this second). I'm inquiring more as a clerk than as an admin. If you see grounds to block, you should; otherwise this should be reopened until a decision is made about Onoja. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 18:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, my mistake. I don't buy Onoja's explanation and their obsession with Edogbo Anthony leads me to believe they won't start contributing positively in other venues once any temporary block expires, so I've indeffed them. Now this case should be done . DatGuyTalkContribs 18:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Clearly working together based on editing style, overlap, and Special:Undelete/Muhammad_Ahmed_Bello vs. Special:PageHistory/Draft:Muhammad Ahmed Bello. Very likely UPE. Indeffed both, requesting CU for parallel accounts or to tie back to a known UPE farm. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 03:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ., but if a CU seems not worth the time giving the part of the world, feel free to close. -- Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 03:54, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * There is enough correlation between these two accounts and the Onoja1 SPI that you could invoke MEAT based on the CU perspective if needed. Any real attempts to analyze CU data are pointless, especially given UPE. -- Amanda (she/her)  04:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Merged from Ogoos11. . Noting for future reference as likely but not quite blockable (CU is negative for outright socking, but this is probably mostly MEAT). --  Tamzin  &#91;cetacean needed&#93; (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 04:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
There is another possible sock puppet. User:Pape2023 he action seems to meat puppet or paid edition with the above report DXdy FX (talk) 07:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Third evidence is their edition on this Draft:Ahmed Musa Dangiwa which is also created by suck puppet


 * DXdy FX (talk) 07:19, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

If you look at their pattern of editing, it’s possibly a paid edition without disclosing it. He has been creating articles for non notable people, editing articles of Bashir Abubakar by adding promotional information which was created by suck puppet. Another one is Usman Musa Shugaba they have been editing the page also all created by suck puppet. DXdy FX (talk) 07:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * i don't know any user kwaro and ogoos11 Pape2023 (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I've repaired this malformed report that was posted to Sockpuppet investigations/Onoja1/Archive by mistake, and edited DXdy FX's comment so as to repair the draft link. No assessment on the merits. eta: Since the abuse filter told me that I shouldn't remove the misplaced comments from the archives, I'll punt it to the clerks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Removed comments from archives, setting back to open., if you're tired of getting caught by the filter, there's a solution for that. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * - There's not evidence to block without technical confirmation, requesting CU. Bbb23 (talk) 21:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The only confirmed accounts are stale but based on information I can find Pape2023 appears to Onoja1.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Behavioral evidence is sufficient after the CU results. The Wordsmith Talk to me 23:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)