Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oohilove-oohilove/Archive

Evidence submitted by Fæ
Promoting the same website with an identical name pattern. Quack applies. Fæ (talk) 08:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Oohilove123 spam-username-blocked. JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN X Man  13:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * just as a note, creating a new account following a user name block is the correct action to take, and does not constitute a violation of WP:SOCK per se. SpitfireTally-ho! 19:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)