Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orugaberuteika/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Two SPAs invested in white-washing the Happy Science article and promoting the organisation. There's been many such accounts, but these two are particularly similar to Orugaberuteika (who was WP:CIR blocked) in their inability to read and understand other editors' arguments. Sorunikusu asks the same questions over and over, exactly like Orugaberuteika (it's the same question O asked, too, based on a lack of understanding of the difference between "x is a fact" and "many people have claimed x"). Also see and  which have some clear visual similarities. Akashi-ohashi behaves in the same disruptive manner, and expresses themself identically - cf for instance and. People with the same native language might use English in a similar way, but there are idiosyncracies here that go beyond a general Japanese EFL issue. bonadea contributions talk 14:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅:
 * Orugaberuteika
 * Sorunikusu
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other and to Group 1.  The technical results that connect the two groups are messy.
 * Akashi-ohashi
 * the Group 1 accounts. the Group 2 accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Tagged with dual tags. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * the Group 1 accounts. the Group 2 accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Tagged with dual tags. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:54, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Obvious sock: asking the exact same questions using the exact same garbled English (probably using a machine translator of some kind). Cf for instance with  – I refuse to believe that several different people can display the same levels of inability to understand what sources say. bonadea contributions talk 14:22, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, tagged, closed. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Like clockwork, another "new" user turns up asking the exact same question, using the exact same kind of phrasing. Cf Orugaberuteika, Detourcontrive (a previously blocked sock), Rtyy1234. bonadea contributions talk 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * GeneralNotability (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)