Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OscarSammeli/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
I initially checked OscarSammeli and JasonBrown92 because of tag-teaming behaviour at Special:PageHistory/Henrik Ekelund. Those two are ✅ to each other. I blocked JasonBrown92 indefinitely and OscarSammeli for two weeks. reported Adeuchar to my talk page based on similar behaviour on the Ekelund article after these two accounts were blocked. From a technical perspective, Adeuchar is, maybe to the two blocked accounts: they are using different devices and ranges but share the same, rather distinctive, geolocation. Leaving on checked for behavioural analysis as the CU result is not conclusive. CU does show that Adeuchar has another account with zero edits, so if it is decided that they are a sockpuppet I will block that account as well. Spicy (talk) 22:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I am satisfied that they are at least a meatpuppet given their edits and comments on their talk page. But I've never blocked for that before and not what to give as the reason. Just an indef with a note?  Doug Weller  talk 09:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * yes, that's what I'd do. Spicy (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Spicy Done. Thanks. Doug Weller  talk 09:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * For the record, Adeuchar's ✅ sleeper is, which I will block. I've also changed the block on OscarSammeli to indef. Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)