Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Osourdounmou/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Aleksandër I Madh Është Shqipëtar is blocked due to disruptive editing and trolling. It was a WP:SPA, making all edits in relation to Origin of the Albanians, a topic of great importance to Albanian identity and culture. Xhfgsepfiuh, another WP:SPA, was created in May, and all edits till now are related to Gjon Kastrioti, a topic of great importance to Albanian identity and culture because Kastrioti was the father of Skanderbeg, the national hero of Albania. Although Xhfgsepfiuh has only 10 edits or so, they are capable of using quotation templates, making page moves, pinging editors, and checking other editor's contributions, indicating they have previous experiences on Wikipedia.


 * Xhfgsepfiuh insists that Gjon Kastrioti is the Albanized form of Ivan Kastriot. The latter is a Serbian version of the name of the said historical figure, . Xhfgsepfiuh is trying to add a fringe POV that Gjon Kastrioti, father of Albania's national hero, was a Serb. It is similar to Aleksander's claim that Albanian culture is rather poor and consists mostly out of the borrowings from their neighbours.
 * The first edit of Aleksander was creating their user page with "qeq", a Kosovo Albanian greeting . The first edit of Xhfgsepfiuh was creating of their user page with a greeting "hello world!".
 * Aleksander opened new discussions on the talk page of the Origin of the Albanians article, providing old outdated sources and fringe Serbian/Yugoslav sources, and taking them out of context to push their POV. Examples, , . Xhfgsepfiuh is doing the same . As can be verified on the links provided, both accounts present their sources with large quotation templates instead of citation templates.
 * When Aleksander responded to other editors, he used quotation templates (green ones), repeating others' words, , . Xhfgsepfiuh is doing the same thing , ,.
 * After making a comment on a talk page, Aleksander kept modifying their original comment. For instance,, , , , . Another example , , , , , . Another example , , , . Xhfgsepfiuh does so. Examples ,  and , , , . Ktrimi991 (talk) 15:42, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Comments by Calthinus
 * I'm adding this at the request of User:Kalinthos:


 * When I first saw Xfg...whatever, I was astonished with his low level of edits as he shows clear knowledge of Wikipedia code. For example, he is able to use beautiful quotation templates I do not know how to produce myself, to be honest []]. His account shows the hallmarks of a WP:SPA -- in this case a very focused obsession with the page Gjon Kastrioti as can be seen from his user history [], and at that the main focus of his account seems to be moving the page, not its content. It was pretty clear that it would be astonishing or this to be a new account. First place to look, is there a banned editor who seems to match his profile? Yes.


 * That would be Aleksandër I Madh Është Shqipëtar, henceforth "AMES", another WP:SPA account solely used for trying to replace the content at Origin of the Albanians so that it advances WP:FRINGE theories like the absurd and rather obscure one that Albanians are not native to their lands but instead came "but yesterday" from Antalya, Turkey (summarized here by me with diffs and all, can also be seen from his edit history). AMES also demonstrated an astonishing ability (for a newbie) to use quotation -- and ref -- templates ( one of many examples: [], doing so even in his very first edits []). Claiming a Serbian origin for Gjon Kastrioti also aligns with a Serbian ultra-nationalist view that erases Albanian history, attempts to delegitimize Albanian statehood, and advances views that Albanians came from obscure and usually "Oriental" places of the world rather than the overwhelming academic consensus that they came from somewhere in the Balkans, either Illyria, Thrace or Dacia. Revealing the "true" Serbian origin of Albanian historical heroes -- Gjon Kastrioti being the father of Gjergj Kastrioti who is famous for leading a decades long rebellion against the Ottomans and securing de facto Albanian independence for decades despite constantly fighting Goliath -- would seem to match this profile perfectly. Similar too is the heavy reliance on the often old works of Yugoslav and Serbian historiography. There are some pretty striking personality resemblances as well, especially his sassy responses and citing of policy to advanced editors while he is (allegedly) a newcomer. At the very least a CheckUser is warranted. More evidence likely to come soon. Gotta run.


 * --Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * When you copied this from the case I made, it seems the diffs I posted were lost. Could we restore them too? Calthinus  (talk)   21:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Even with AMES small number of edits as Xhfgwhatever, even more striking behavioral similarity becomes apparent.
 * Further evidence by Calthinus
 * AMES loved to spam talk pages with beautifully presented quotes -- typically using either "quote", "pre" or "talkquote" templates-- from sources he had synthesized [].
 * Toward the end of his career in disruption, he demonstrated that he had developed a clear preference for the "quote" and "talkquote" templates []. As Xhfgwhatever, he does the same, even with the exact same format of stating the author first, followed by a quick and usually biased summary, with a colon, and then a large quote [].
 * AMES, being vain, seemed to enjoy using the "talkquote" template for putting the statements of other users in (very flashy) quotes when responding to them []; he does this too with his new account Xfghwhatever, even using the exact same format as quoting one at statement at a time-- even ones that barely deserve a response like "Happy constructive editing" -- and responding to them []. For a comparison to Xfghwhatever actually responding to me telling him "Happy constructive editing", see AMES responding to Resnjari saying "I look forward to your response".[]
 * Despite feigning expertise, AMES really had no idea what he was talking about. He would just find sources he thought backed his point, put them in beautiful quotes and rant on the talk page. As a result, often his source choice was sub-par, to say the least. AMES fell foul of choosing the output of Serbian nationalist historiography with some peppering from its "Yugoslav" incarnation that occurred in various periods. With only one major post, we observe Xhfg similarly seriously using the work of the pan-Slavist Jirecek from 1899 [].
 * Once again being pretentious and vain, AMES loves to use bold italics, especially for non-English text, when delivering his beautiful quote templates[] (more examples of this behavior abound). He has retained this habit as Xhfgwhatever [].
 * AMES loves to dump on talk pages lists in numbered format (1., 2., 3. … sometimes up to 3 sometimes up to 30) of template-quoted sources he has cherrypicked and synthed to support his campaign to make the page match his (non-consensus) views [] []. As does Xhfgwhatever [].

It doesn't even end here-- I could go on. He didn't even try to hide himself. On second thought, a CheckUser would be nice but it shouldn't be necessary -- the behavioral evidence is damning enough as it is, and if you need more, just ask. What's telling most of all is that and I seem to have independently come to the exact same conclusion (to the point that I posted my own SPI without realizing he had also done so!) with very little time interacting with the user. Calthinus (talk)  13:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The usage of quotation templates (the green ones) alone is enough to recognize the relation between the two accounts., , , , , . The same templates, the same repetition of other people's words etc. Ktrimi991 (talk) 14:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I added a diff today as the sock repeated the unique and strange practice of repeating other editors' words in green quotation templates. Ktrimi991 (talk)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:55, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The evidence is quacking into a loudspeaker with just two edits.

His first [] was to continue a long term slow edit war and POV pushing campaign on the identity of Gjon Kastrioti that had previously been Xhfgwhatever's obsession []. Xhfg whatever was Aleksander I Madh Eshte Shkipetar's last sock. The edit summary asserted that a previous edit by Xhfg's partner in crime Skylax30 was "legitimate" [] -- but a truly new user would probably never look first to the history of hte page let alone know who is who among other editors.

His second edit was to place nice warm greeting on his previous POV-pushing (they have been collaborating to push their fringe POV that Gjon Kastrioti's "real" name was either Ivan or Jovan-- though they can't decide on which :) ) comrade Skylax30's talk page []. Because new editors would go straight to talk pages? Dubious. He also placed a warning about numerous other users including and  who it is dubious an actual newbie would know of -- and he even alleged that  was the "same personality" as both of them. This is significant because Bbb23 has no role in the actual dispute of this page-- his only connection is via the previous sockpuppet investigation.

Coincidence? Nearly impossible. Calthinus (talk) 17:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I would like to add, given this user's past history, it is widely agreed that their sole goal on Wikipedia is to rant against Albanians and the existence of such rants is poisonous in the already toxic Balkan editing atmosphere. As such, I request a range block to prevent further disruption (even a quick look at the mess on Talk:Gjon Kastrioti can reveal how insidious this behavior is in poisoning relations between different Balkan nationalities). A summary of his poisonous effect on Wikipedia can be found here []. Calthinus (talk) 17:44, 5 July 2018 (UTC) Withdrew request, TU-nor is right, my bad, it looks like they are in Ljubljana where there could possibly be collateral.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Apart from the disappointing comments by the IP, regarding myself i created my account in Australia and have always accessed my Wikipedia account from Australia from a computer that only i have access to.Resnjari (talk)
 * I am quite sure you are right about the IP being our Aleksandër (or Xhf-whatever). The suggestion of a range block is, however, not realistic. A range block is only used against IP-hoppers that use several IPs within the same range for their socking, and only if the collateral damage (good editors being stopped by the block) is small. In this case, there is no suspect activity even in a broad range, so a range block is out of the question at this point. If they are blocked with this IP and come back with a new IP, it may be another matter. Time will show, and it is wise to be alert. --T*U (talk) 20:55, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP now stale. Closing. Sro23 (talk) 01:07, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

An editor with has performed a series of problematic moves without any consensus, many of which are in explicitly against past consensuses. A motive in provocation is likely, given that the target is Gjon Kastrioti, the object of long and acrimonious talk page fights and continuous move warring with the objective of obscuring the "Albanianness" of the figure, whose son is the national hero of Albania, Skanderbeg. See this earlier move request (Talk:John_of_Castriot) by a now blocked WP:NOTHERE sockpuppet who was obsessed with proving that Albanians come from Antalya in Turkey and have a "rather poor culture that consists mostly of borrowings from neighbors"

Very interesting is that when performing this move, the user added the supposed Serbian name of Gjon Kastrioti, Ivan Kastriot [], which was an obsession of the past sockpuppet (of course, with some disagreement between the sockpuppet and his "allies" over whether the "correct" Serbian name was Ivan Kastriota, Ivan Kastriot, Jovan Kastriotic, Jovan Kastriota or other permutations of these...).

The current user moved the page to John of Castriot, claiming this is the name in use in the English language. This is patently false. See Google Scholar : zero results [].

Admin help in reverting these disruptive moves is requested. Aside from Gjon Kastrioti, other affected pages include House of Kastrioti ([]) and Gjon Kastrioti II ([]). --Calthinus (talk) 16:06, 8 October 2018 (UTC) (comment cross-posted from WP:ANI, original here Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Kinda rushed right now-- but I have doubts that this is an outright sockpuppet, and "a user with a penchant for English-language moves" is quite possible. An IP that may be connected to this user (which is currently reverting me) is from Bavaria ([]), AMES edited from Slovenia. Serbian and Slovene communities do exist in Bavaria or he could be traveling, but the series of Arab world edits beforehand is surprising. The things that did raise my suspicions originally was this: insertion of "Ivan Kastriot" [] (one of AMES' obsessions as Xhfg, his first sock). What I suspect right now is off-wiki recruitment, which would match the pattern of earlier suspicions that I and had regarding coordination between a previous sock and a currently blocked Greek-focused user.--Calthinus (talk) 16:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This aside, a pattern of using an IP to revert also seems likely at the moment.--Calthinus (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The IP likely socks are also focused on adding the rare Slavic name "Castriotich" [] to relevant pages.--Calthinus (talk) 16:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The account does not seem to be Aleksandër I Madh Është Shqipëtar. I can not elaborate much on the issue right now due to being busy. However, Fongtzack might be linked with . All these accounts are focused on moving articles, specifically Middle Eastern articles and articles of personalities of great importance to Albanian national identity. They might be three friends with off-wiki coordination (at least Doltjank and Osourdounmou seem to be two friends with some off-wiki coordination). Ktrimi991 (talk) 17:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * CU results confirmed what I said above. Ktrimi991 (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * you mentioned in the ANI thread that there were some edits in common between this account and the sockpuppeteer. Could you provide some diffs? I'm not quite convinced this isn't a user with a penchant for English-language moves, given their brief history. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Added a couple IPs that have been following around some of Fongtzack's moves, which in my mind suggests a certain variety of off-wiki coordination. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:44, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * no worries, I'm a bit pressed for time myself and I'll come back to this later if another clerk doesn't beat me to it. It's clearly one user with all the IPs, and AMES was using likely open proxies for their edits which appeared to be from Slovenia, so I'm not too confident in that geolocation. The new ones are all pretty consistently Bavarian. It looks to me like the person with the IPs either created or asked a friend to create an account so that they could coordinate on the out-of-consensus moves, and maybe that's enough to block for meatpuppetry but I would like to think about whether this is a recruited good-faith user, or outright sockpuppetry, or somewhere in the middle. If you have diffs of Fongtzack restoring specific content that AMES added before, that would help. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:54, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If I remember correctly, the AMES socks and their "ally" enjoyed adding the "Kastriotic" spelling ("Castriotich" is spelled different but it is essentially the same as per Serbo-Albanian issues) -- pinging for help as I really gotta go. It is entirely possible we were hasty on this one, but it does deserve some investigation. --Calthinus (talk) 16:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * . Please move case to Osourdounmou.  All of these accounts have been indeffed at de.wiki. There is significant cross-wiki abuse, although some have no edits at en.wiki. Please globally lock the accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Case page moved. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . Please move case to Osourdounmou.  All of these accounts have been indeffed at de.wiki. There is significant cross-wiki abuse, although some have no edits at en.wiki. Please globally lock the accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Case page moved. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . Please move case to Osourdounmou.  All of these accounts have been indeffed at de.wiki. There is significant cross-wiki abuse, although some have no edits at en.wiki. Please globally lock the accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Case page moved. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . Please move case to Osourdounmou.  All of these accounts have been indeffed at de.wiki. There is significant cross-wiki abuse, although some have no edits at en.wiki. Please globally lock the accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Case page moved. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * . Please move case to Osourdounmou.  All of these accounts have been indeffed at de.wiki. There is significant cross-wiki abuse, although some have no edits at en.wiki. Please globally lock the accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Case page moved. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Locked all. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 22:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Case page moved. Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Tugrad was created in 2016 and made some edits before disappearing. On October 8, 2018 the suspected master and a bunch of their socks were blocked. A day later Tugrad emerged from inactivity and is making the same kind of edits: obsessed with renaming Albanian and Ottoman articles. A CU is needed to verify possible connections and look for other potential socks. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ + . Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Hayodzazgi was created in 2016 and made some edits before disappearing. On October 24, 2018 a bunch of Osourdounmou's socks were blocked. A week later Hayodzazgi emerged from inactivity and is making the same kind of edits: obsessed with renaming Albanian and Ottoman articles. A CU is needed to verify possible connections and look for other potential socks. Ktrimi991 (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * They have also repeated some edits of Osourdounmou and socks. Some examples:
 * 1.
 * 2.. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:25, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus:
 * . No other accounts seen at this time, but it's apparent this user planned ahead and probably has many sleepers at their disposal. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * . No other accounts seen at this time, but it's apparent this user planned ahead and probably has many sleepers at their disposal. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Tschenarin has moved or redirected Faik Konica, Aleksandër Moisiu and Gjergj Pekmezi to strange and fringe names just like the suspected master. A CU is needed to check for additional socks. Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * The name Tschenarin is similar with . Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Per evidence. Please also check for sleepers. Thanks, GABgab 00:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ + . . Please globally lock the two accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It seams that is ignoring this message. Case closed.  Vanjagenije   (talk)  15:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Or missed the ping. Done. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seemitfe shows the exact same pattern shown by Osourdounmu of moving pagenames of well-known Albanian figures from their well-known Albanian names in favor of obscure or even invented alternatives based on them being used "this way" in some obscure obselete English (or not at all, in reality) ; see the archive on Osourdoumou for more, it's one big saga of exactly this. Some examples of Seemitfe's identical behavior follow:
 * Gjergj Arianiti to George Aryaniti . The only time this was string ever used in academic writing seems to be a June 2019 masters thesis.
 * Lekë Dushmani to Lek Dushman the supposed "English name at the time" . This, again, matches Osourdounmou's obsession with using the supposed "real" English names from the time in question [] []... as does Seemitfe elsewhere (this is another case of imposing a "real" English name on a figure who is barely ever referred to in the English language)
 * Gjon Muzaka to Giovanni Musachi []. By the way, note how all of these moves are done without fixing the inline name usage -- a frequent specialty of Osourdounmou's mischief.

Like Osourdounmu, Seemitfe has a focus on making sure Albanian places and figures from Serbia and Macedonia are given names as they would be written in (Latinized) Serbian or Macedonian

We see both of them doing the same for names of non-Greek entities (especially Albanian and Turkish) in Greece as well. Osourdounmou:. Seemitfe:

Like Osourdounmu, Seemitfe also has interest in various mosques, specifically those in the Balkans and Ottoman areas of the Middle East, and in both cases, their main focus is nomenclature. Seemitfe:, Osourdounmou:. Seemitfe's interest in Et'hem Bey Mosque [ meshes with the fact that Osourdounmou is the only person to ever edit the page of the man who founded it.

It is quite suggestive for a sock of someone focused on redirects, piping and so forth, that Seemitfe fixed a redirect with a link to the target page, behavior one rarely if ever sees from true newcomers -- also, it's quite interesting is that he did so while editing a draft article without invitation.

Pinging as he sniffed out the last wage of Osourdounmou socks. A CU is requested as this is a known user of sleeper accounts (see the archives). Cheers.--Calthinus (talk) 00:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Just wanted to add: here is something that is essentially a smoking gun -- []. The two did basically the exact same move of the completely obscure entity's name to change Eje'i to Ezhe'i. The one difference that Osourdounmou used "Gholamhossein" and Seemitfe used "Gholam-Hussein" is easily explicable since once the redirect page had already been created for the former, it made the new sock Seemitfe unable to move it onto that target.--Calthinus (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * I was going to report the obvious sock, but Calthinus was faster than me. I reported several socks of this master in the past, and I fully agree with Calthinus. I do not have the time now for more input, but if more diffs are needed, an SPI clerk can ping me. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 01:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.'''
 * The filing presents a compelling list of similarities. I also note edit summary similarities, e.g. Seemitfe / previous sock Hayodzazgi; or ctrl+f "as per" in and . Blockable on behavioral evidence alone, but  to check for sleepers due to the history of them documented in the archive.  -- Tamzin  [cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 02:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * All previous socks ~TNT (she/they • talk) 03:00, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * are all ✅ to each other. Not blocked/tagged due to for comparison ~TNT (she/they • talk) 03:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Sam. On the behavioral side, I stand by my finding that Seemitfe is a proven sock of Osourdounmou. Similar tell-tale edit summaries in the other three accounts make this all the more obvious. for the following indefinite blocks (and optional taggings):
 * Seemitfe as a confirmed sockmaster and a proven sockpuppet of Osourdounmou
 * Luuhu as a confirmed sockpuppet of Seemitfe and a proven sockpuppet of Osourdounmou
 * EllatheElefant: ditto
 * Hueschi: ditto
 *  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ,, closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * EllatheElefant: ditto
 * Hueschi: ditto
 *  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ,, closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pro forma filing; see (permalink). Requesting CU to confirm locally and check for sleepers based on this sockmaster's past history of them. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 00:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of their training as a clerk. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on their talk page or on this page.'''
 * . --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 00:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 00:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 00:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I see TNT picked this up just before I did. I'll stand down. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * - is confirmed to . Please tag. SPI on hold due to an uncovered account ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 00:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Check completed, 2O'd by, account unrelated ~TheresNoTime (to explain!) 01:23, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Sam and GN. as confirmed to Seemitfe through Ella, proven to master by the transitive property of sockpuppetry.  Closing.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)