Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Osterhob/Archive

02 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both accounts created today, both accounts have edited only one article, The article is a hoax and uses offensive terms against Wikipedia in the ref name parameter. Both have done useless edits that seem to be cordinated, Example:Edit of Nick Eyles, edit by Osterhob. I have tagged the article for speedy deletion, in case it gets deleted before the case is examined it may be relevant to know that at the time of this writing it had close to 100 edits by both users from 6:11 to 8:44 2 May. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 09:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Please withdraw the request The article was not a hoax, the term did not apear on the references provided, but the have now been fixed. The fact that they used another article as template and the profanity on the ref names was what throw me of, The author apologized for using profanity in the ref names and claimed that both users are different people, two students working together on a project for a class, even though many of the edits did not seem to be constructive It looks like I may have jumped the gun here.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 15:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)