Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Oxycut/Archive

09 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Oxy was blocked by me for being a general purpose troll. Nude has an extraordinary number of intersects and only one edit before Oxy was blocked, a classic sleeper, creating useful cats like Category:Monorchism and monorchid people. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Self endorsing for sleeper check based on previous use of sleepers here. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are a ✅ match:
 * The following accounts are a ✅ match to each other and a one to Oxycut
 * That's all, folks. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 13:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that certainly justifies my initial "you are a troll" block of Oxy. I've blocked/reblocked as socks and tagged.  Will leave to another clerk to close and archive since I started this.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 13:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I recommend that clerks leave this case open for now, as the CU is comparing notes with a previous CU regarding a possible different and well established Master. See my talk page.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 14:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * These are accounts of User:DavidYork71, a prolific sockpuppeteer.- gadfium 20:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I had suspected as much and contacted another CU, because I had no technical data to compare these accounts to; he has not replied to my mail yet, but the more I examine this guy's editing pattern, the more I'm convinced that these accounts were operated by DavidYork. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 16:52, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Then delaying close until confirmation, under the assumption that a page move is likely. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 16:58, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Given the delay in responding here, I'm archiving this case. However, this is without prejudice to un-archiving in the event that you guys decide a page move is necessary. AGK  [•] 12:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That's all, folks. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 13:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that certainly justifies my initial "you are a troll" block of Oxy. I've blocked/reblocked as socks and tagged.  Will leave to another clerk to close and archive since I started this.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 13:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I recommend that clerks leave this case open for now, as the CU is comparing notes with a previous CU regarding a possible different and well established Master. See my talk page.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 14:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * These are accounts of User:DavidYork71, a prolific sockpuppeteer.- gadfium 20:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I had suspected as much and contacted another CU, because I had no technical data to compare these accounts to; he has not replied to my mail yet, but the more I examine this guy's editing pattern, the more I'm convinced that these accounts were operated by DavidYork. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 16:52, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Then delaying close until confirmation, under the assumption that a page move is likely. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 16:58, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Given the delay in responding here, I'm archiving this case. However, this is without prejudice to un-archiving in the event that you guys decide a page move is necessary. AGK  [•] 12:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Given the delay in responding here, I'm archiving this case. However, this is without prejudice to un-archiving in the event that you guys decide a page move is necessary. AGK  [•] 12:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)